Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerNew UCL competitor decision: No Doubt v. Activision Publishing, Inc.
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
The rock band No Doubt entered into a licensing agreement allowing Activision to use avatars of the band members in the video game Band Hero. When Activision used the avatars in a manner that exceeded the scope of the licensing agreement, No Doubt sued for violation of the UCL's "fraudulent" prong, arguing that Activision's conduct was likely to deceive a reasonable consumer.
The trial court denied Activision's anti-SLAPP motion, and the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Four) affirmed, holding that No Doubt had established it was likely to prevail on the UCL claim. No Doubt v. Activision Publishing, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Feb. 15, 2011). The opinion does not address standing, but it does contain an interesting discussion of the possible interplay between the UCL and the First Amendment. Slip op. at 22-28.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on February 23, 2011 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Activision
alleging false advertising of games for Nintendo Wii, that do not support Dolby Pro Logic II surround sound.

Case Update: No Doubt v. Activision Publishing Inc.
Case Update: No Doubt v. Activision
Appeals Court Rules: No Doubt Lawsuit Against Activision Can Proceed
Activision countersues No Doubt in 'Band Hero' flap
No Doubt Wins a Few Skirmishes in War with ATVI
An Update on the No Doubt v. Activision Suit: The End of Guitar Hero








