ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Ninth Circuit: Creator?s Family Doesn?t Hold Copyright To Betty Boop

By Chad Bray

ADVERTISEMENTS

bettyboopThe family of legendary animator Max Fleischer doesn’t hold a valid copyright or trademark for cartoon character Betty Boop, which he created, a federal appeals court has ruled.

In a 2-1 decision Wednesday, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s ruling that Fleischer Studios Inc. doesn’t have standing to bring a trademark infringement lawsuit against several other companies that license Betty Boop merchandise, including Avela Inc.–namely it was unable to prove the chain of how the rights to the character was transferred over the years.

You can read a Reuters story on the decision here and the decision itself here.

“If we ruled that Avela’s depictions of Betty Boop infringed Fleischer’s trademarks, the Betty Boop character would essentially never enter the public domain,” U.S. Circuit Judge J. Clifford Wallace wrote.

Max Fleischer created Betty Boop in 1930 and sold the rights to her cartoons and the character about 10 years after creating her. His family, in an attempt to revive the Fleischer cartoon business, incorporated Fleisher Studios in the early 1970s and attempted to repurchase the intellectual property rights to the character.

The decision comes as the families of other comic book and cartoon character creators seek to assert their rights to classic characters, such as Superman and the X-Men.

Marvel Entertainment, now part of Walt Disney Co., sued the heirs of Jack Kirby last year in federal court in Manhattan after his family moved to terminate Marvel’s rights to Spider-man, the Fantastic Four, the X-Men and other characters. That case is pending.

In 2009, the heirs of Jerry Siegel, Superman’s co-creator, recaptured limited rights to several early works that depicted Superman’s origin from Time Warner Inc.’s Warner Brothers and DC Comics.


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on February 23, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0038 secs (from cache 11/01/26 01:26:32)