Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> National Eminent Domain Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: National Eminent Domain BlogWill Iowa Restrict the Use of Eminent Domain?
By Alan Ackerman
Iowa officials have always had a penchant for building large reservoirs. Containment and utilization of waters are a key part of state economic activity and farming. A reform bill proposes to heighten the burden on condemning agencies from a preponderance of the evidence to clear and convincing proof. This will make it much more difficult to acquire land for reservoirs and other purposes. Further, the historical sites limitation could create havoc and inhibit long-term economic development. While reform is needed, there should be a balance.
House File 64 stipulates that the property acquisition phase of a project cannot begin without signed authorization of the governor. It also changes the standard of proof in eminent domain cases from a 'preponderance of the evidence' to 'clear and convincing evidence.'
Debate over eminent domain has raged in Iowa for several years. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was permissible for state and local governments to take private property for private business development. That inspired legislation in Iowa to counter the ruling and require governments to prove beyond a certain threshold that taking the property would be for the public good, not simply for economic development.
Flash forward to today, and officials in Clark County say a new reservoir is a critical public need because the area's current water supply is being used nearly to capacity. Neighbors of the rural area where the reservoir would be constructed have alleged that the water need has been drastically overestimated, and that the underlying goal of the project is to increase recreation and tourism.
Also included in the bill would be a prohibition on the condemnation of property on the National Register of Historic Places. It would also prohibit any project that receives state funding or assistance through specified economic development, tourism or community betterment programs to be defined as 'public use.'
Full post as published by National Eminent Domain Blog on February 24, 2011 (boomark / email).
Eminent Domain
University of Akron pays property owner $443,000 settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.
Downtown Improvement
Springfield to pay more than $2.5 million settlement in eminent domain lawsuit.
Condo Eminent Domain
Maui pays $4.1 million settlement to property owner.
Landfill Eminent Domain
Surry County pays $800,000 settlement to purchase farm land for town dump.
Stadium Eminent Domain
City of Arlington agrees to $2 million Dallas Cowboys stadium settlement.

Osceola lake plan sparks dispute on Iowas eminent domain law (The Des Moines Register)
Off To The ALI-ABA Eminent Domain Conferences
Call For Eminent Domain Photos For Upcoming ABA Book
Two New Books On Eminent Domain
Art Imitates Life In eminent domain: nyc







