Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerRecording of Third Circuit en banc argument in Sullivan available online
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Third Circuit, sitting en banc, heard oral argument last Tuesday, February 23, 2011, in Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc., no. 08-2784. The audio recording of the argument is available at this link (large .wma file).
This is the case in which the original three-judge panel reversed the district court's order granting final approval of a nationwide class action settlement. The case involves antitrust price-fixing claims against the diamond industry. This is my original blog post on that decision.
A few months after rehearing was granted, the en banc panel requested further briefing on a long and interesting list of issues.
The objector is represented on appeal by Howard Bashman, author of How Appealing. Professor Samuel Issacharoff of New York University School of Law argued for the settlement class.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on March 01, 2011 (boomark / email).
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Online Medication Sites
Prescription Drugs Sold Without Prescriptions
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Today's En Banc 1st Circuit Oral Argument in Textron Tax Accrual Work Papers Case
Seventh Circuit En Banc Argument in the Second Amendment / Violent Misdemeanants Case (Skoien)
CAFC Sets Date for Oral Argument En Banc in Inequitable Conduct Appeal









