ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> First Amendment Center

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: First Amendment Center

Utah gov. signs bill limiting open-records law

By By The Associated Press

ADVERTISEMENTS

SALT LAKE CITY ? Utah Gov. Gary Herbert has signed a bill revising the state's open-records law only hours after more than 100 people rallied against the bill in the Capitol rotunda.

House Bill 477 makes the text messages and voice mails of government officials private and restricts access to most communication, including e-mails, between legislators and staff or constituents. Fees for records are to increase when the new law becomes effective July 1.

Herbert says revisions can be made to the law before its effective date.

Before yesterday?s signing, multiple speakers at a rally demanded a veto.

Kim Burningham, a board member with Utahns for Ethical Government, says the measure will dramatically reduce transparency in state government. Just because the effective date was delayed doesn't make the changes less draconian, she said.

Utah news-media outlets also opposed the bill vehemently, running front page editorials last weekend and paying for newspaper advertisements.

The changes to Utah's open-records law will be major, according to opponents. Currently, state law uses the content of a document or communication to determine whether it is public.

Fees would also increase. Along with administrative costs, government agencies could charge the full cost of overhead and staff time on any request.

Legislative leaders and other supporters of House Bill 477 said the current law was written 20 years ago when such informal modes of communication as text messaging and e-mail were not widely used.

Supporters also claimed that complicated requests required excessive time by staff. Some legislators described these requests as "fishing expeditions."

Earlier this week, state Rep. John Dougall, R-American Fork, said the delay in the measure?s implementation would give all interested parties a chance to improve the bill. If needed, the Legislature could amend the law further during a special session before July 1.

"I'm always OK with talking about it," Dougall said. "This isn't the end. It's only the start of the discussions."

State Sen. Ben McAdams, D-Salt Lake City, said before the governor signed the measure that the delay wouldn't change his opinion of the bill.

"Bad legislation is still bad legislation, no matter when it goes into effect," McAdams said.

Full post as published by First Amendment Center on March 08, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)