Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Seattle Trademark LawyerNinth Circuit Decides Competitor Keyword Advertising Case
By Michael Atkins
Not much time to blog, as I’m preparing for my keyword panel discussion.
That said, the Ninth Circuit released a pretty juicy keyword decision Tuesday: Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.
It holds the purchase of a competitor’s trademark constituted a “use” in commerce but didn’t infringe the trademark owner’s rights. The decision is filtered through the prism of the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, and the defendant is in a different position than Google in the recent Rosetta Stone case, but it seems to bode well for Google and other search engine providers.
The case cite is Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc., No. 10-55840 (9th Cir. March 8, 2011).
Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on March 10, 2011 (boomark / email).
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Philip Morris
Jury Decides Against Big Tobacco
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Google
alleging that companies who used internet advertising to sell mobile content have overpaid for keywords.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Comcast Corp.
alleging false advertising related to the speed of its Internet service.

Ninth Circuit Decision Protects Keyword Advertising Against Trademark Claim
Rulings allow use of competitors name in ads
SEO in 30 Days, Day 7: Keyword Research, Step 5
Update: Canadian Keyword Advertising
Recent Ninth Circuit UCL competitor decision: Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp.
1-800 Contacts Sues LensWorld For Keyword Advertising









