Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> The Wired GC
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: The Wired GCHowrey 4: Contingency vs. Continuity
By John Wallbillich
ADVERTISEMENTS
It’s day four of the Howrey Watch. We take a look at the assertion by Howrey CEO Robert Ruyak that an increase in litigation work on a contingent fee was a major contributor to the firm’s demise.
From the WSJ Law Blog interview:
As clients began looking to lower their legal costs, the firm took on a growing proportion of work on a contingency or partial contingency basis-shifting a big portion of its business into what Ruyak described as ?future recovery.?
Future recovery? More lik read more
Full post as published by The Wired GC on March 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CEO Ruyak Partly Blames Contingency-Fees, Discovery Vendors, for Howreys Fall
What Else Happened to Howrey Heres More From CEO Ruyak
Who Will Milk Fees From Howrey's Mammoth Antitrust Case
Former clients sue Howrey, Howrey partner over bad patent deal
More Howrey Partners Moving Ahead of Dissolution







