Religion & Law

9th Circuit Upholds California's COVID Restrictions On Religious Services

By Howard M. Friedman

 In Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom, (9th Cir., Oct. 1, 2020), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision refused to issue a preliminary injunction against Governor Gavin Newsom?s COVID-19 Orders that restrict in-person worship services. The majority said in part: 

The evidence that was before the district court does not support Harvest Rock?s arguments that the Orders accord comparable secular activity more favorable treatment than religious activity. The Orders apply the same restrictions to worship services as they do to other indoor congregate events, such as lectures and movie theaters....

Harvest Rock also contends that the Governor failed to provide a rationale for the more lenient treatment of certain secular activities, such as shopping in a large store. However, the Governor offered the declaration of an expert, Dr. James Watt, in support of the claim that the risk of COVID-19 is elevated in indoor congregate activities, including in-person worship services.

Judge O'Scannlain dissented, saying in part:

There is no doubt that California?s COVID-19 scheme ... imposes direct and severe burdens on religious practice within the State. And where a State imposes such burdens through measures that are not ?neutral and of general applicability,? its actions must survive strict scrutiny.... Because California?s COVID-19 regulations patently disfavor religious practice when compared to analogous secular activities, I believe that the church is quite likely indeed to succeed on the merits of its challenge to such regulations.

Los Angeles Times reports on the decision.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on October 04, 2020 (boomark / email).