ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

KingCast says Kelly Ayotte and Jeffery Strelzin may be lying again, claim they have no fingerprint evidence on Liko Kenney's gun.

By Christopher King

ADVERTISEMENTS
First off, newbies should read this documented set of lies that Kelly and other LE have told about Floyd.

Next: Is this the shell game again?

In this 18 April 2008 post I reminded Defendant Ayotte that she was quite tardy in her RSA 91-A responses to me on the fingerprint/guns issue. She had responded a while back and asked for her usual 30-45 days or whatever. Meanwhile in response to a similar request in Court (read the Interrogatories and RFPs here) she issued a Motion to Strike my request, claiming that that material was not relevant to the RSA 91-A Action as filed.

Today I get a letter dated 18 April 2008 that does not reference my original RSA 91-A request 2 months ago for these materials but only cryptically says

"I have reviewed the April 18, 2008 email you sent us. This office does not possess any documents, beyond those already provided, which are responsive to your request."

So we're supposed to believe that they conducted no fingerprint analysis and/or maintained no fingerprint files.

And we're not supposed to wonder how in the hell Gregory W. Floyd wound up with Liko's live round in his pocket.

Who the hell writes a Memorandum Contra over documents they don't have? Think about it. They just say "We ain't got nothin' the point is moot."

Who the hell conducts a homicide "investigation" without fingerprinting the guns in a situation like this? That would fall below minimum standards for police efficacy but then so too does letting Floyd go home with a live round in his pocket. What were they too busy giving him attaboys to search him? What a bunch of tools.

Remember: Trooper Cooper said it was important.

Or does Troop F have the fingerprint analysis and Kelly and Jeffery are playing the shell game? Strelzin is good at that (read more) but in the end I revealed that they had a mountain of information about Gregory W. Floyd that they withheld from the public. Information that shows him to be a dangerous man, as AJ Boisvert will tell you. As Liko Kenney cannot.

This case stinks to high hell and I will be going to the FBI on it after the Feds respond to my pending FOIA request which is almost due. Time for a public records request to Troop F to cover my bases.

What a cesspool. I feel dirty wading into it but wade I must. The talismanic kabuki dance continues unabated. All these LE can't tell you how Floyd walks away with a bullet in his pocket, and they claim they worked with what, 50 LE in total and there's not a fingerprint analysis to be found? Smells like bullshit to me.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on April 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0142 secs (new cache)