Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Durham-in-Wonderland

Criminal Law

: Durham-in-Wonderland

Responding to "Reharmonizer"

By KC Johnson

As DIW readers know, I generally have avoided making my own comments over the last several months, and have confined myself to the occasional post. I thought, however, it might be useful for me to respond to the reharmonizer comment in the Lubiano thread below. I?ll leave this post here for a day or so, and then move it to an appropriate place in the thread. For those who haven?t seen the reharmonizer comment, I?m reproducing it in full, with my comments ad seriatim. Comments on this post, and the Lubiano publication post, can be made in the thread below. ?I was wondering when you?d get around to demolishing this article. It?s been out for months now! And the authors seem to have been awfully sloppy. They confused FODU with the Association for Truth and Fairness (but though they?re wrong to say FODU was founded to raise legal defense funds, their statement that those frequenting the site ?deliberated on the details of the unfolding case, with increasing attention to the motivations and actions of the district attorney? seems pretty accurate to me)...continue to full post

Full post as published by Durham-in-Wonderland on April 24, 2008 (boomark / email).