ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> New Law Blogs Blogs -> Food Poisoning Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

New Law Blogs

: Food Poisoning Law Blog

18 Sickened in Hepatitis A Outbreak Associated with the La Mesa Chipotle

By Pritzker | Ruohonen

ADVERTISEMENTS

chipotle.jpgThe number of hepatitis A cases associated with Chipotle in La Mesa, California has risen to 18. Health officials are still looking for the source of the outbreak.  According to the San Diego County Health Department, all 26 food handlers identified to date by the restaurant have tested negative for active hepatitis A infection. Given the long incubation period for hepatitis A (10 to 50 days), this is not conclusive evidence that a food handler did not contaminate food eaten by those who have tested positive for hepatitis A. The negative test results do make it a little more likely that the source of the outbreak is a food product that was contaminated before it got to the La Mesa Chipotle restaurant.  The long incubation period for hepatitis A will make it extremely difficult to pinpoint a specific food product that is the source of the outbreak.

Even if the source of a hepatitis A outbreak is never found, other microbiological evidence along with epidemiological evidence can be sufficient to find a restaurant liable for money damages. In this outbreak the microbiological proof consists of the tests run to determine the people were sickened by hepatitis A.  But just knowing that the people have hepatitis A does not link the illnesses to Chipotle. Health officials made the connection between the illnesses and the La Mesa Chipotle with epidemiological evidence. 

Epidemiology is part detective work and part statistical analysis. It involves trying to piece together potential sources (stores, restaurants, and food products as well as water and animal exposures) and determine if they are the source of the illness that the microbiologists were able to identify.  Epidemiologists develop and test hypotheses to determine if there is a common link between the people with the same foodborne illness. They question foodborne illness patients in order to determine if they ate at the same place, ate the same food, got sick at the same time, lived in the same area, etc. They also visit suspected outbreak sources and do further testing. By a process of elimination, epidemiologists rule out other sources until they can settle on a common link.

In this case, epidemiologists discovered that the people with hepatitis A had eaten at the La Mesa Chipotle within a specific time period.

For more information about proving a foodborne illness case, please see our previous entry, “Proving Foodborne Illness: How Lawyers Evaluate Defective Food Product Cases.”

Full post as published by Food Poisoning Law Blog on April 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0171 secs (new cache)