Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Georgia Bankruptcy Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bankruptcy
: Georgia Bankruptcy Blog11th Circuit - In A Case Of First Impression, Court Rules On Proportionate Liability In Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Of 1995
By Scott Riddle
Not a Bankruptcy case, but relevant to corporate and shareholder litigation:
KITTIE LAPERRIERE, Class certification, to consist of all persons who acquired the publicly traded equity securities of Vesta Insurance Group, Inc., between June 2, 1995, and June 28, 1998, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Excluded from the class, ISRAEL BURGER, RICHARD SULLIVAN, POINTERS, THE CLEANERS & CAULKERS LOCAL 1 PENSION FUND, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
versus
VESTA INSURANCE GROUP, INC., et al., TORCHMARK CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.No. 06-14524 (April 30, 2008) (Click here for opinion).
This interlocutory appeal presents an issue of first impression in the circuit courts: whether, and to what extent, the proportionate liability scheme of section 21(D)(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”),1 enacted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”), amends section 20(a) of the Act, under which a person who controls a violator of the Act is “liable jointly and severally with and to the same extent” as that violator.
......
We conclude that section 20(a) controlling person liability survives section 21(D)(f)’s proportionate liability scheme. Those who would have been substantively liable as controlling person under section 20(a) before the PSLRA was enacted will be substantively liable after its enactment. All that the PSLRA has changed for controlling persons is the standard for deciding whether their responsibility for damages is joint and several or proportionate. Damages are now allocated based on the proportionate liability provisions in the PSLRA, including the provision that knowing violators of the securities laws are “liable for damages jointly and severally.” The district court’s order denying Appellants’ motion to strike Torchmark’s PSLRA-based affirmative defenses is AFFIRMED.
Full post as published by Georgia Bankruptcy Blog on April 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.

Ninth Circuit fine tunes the pleading standard for securities fraud
CA1: what is enough of a risk under the PSLRA to show scienter
Rose on Securities Litigation Reform








