ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Arbitration & Mediation Blogs -> Florida Arbitration Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Arbitration & Mediation

: Florida Arbitration Law

Is Waiver of a Forum Selection Clause a "Permanent Waiver" For Subsequent Disputes?

By Christopher B. Hopkins, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

We last touched upon the question of waiver back in February with the discussion of the Estate of Orlanis v. Oakwood Terrace and Regents Park case involving waiver of the right to arbitrate. The Fifth District has now issued an opinion regarding the waiver of a forum selection clause, relying upon similar case authority.

In Texas Auto Mart, Inc. v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc., the parties got into a dispute over a lease and Texas Auto sued. Thrifty claimed that the venue was in another state under a mandatory forum selection clause. Trial court agreed even though, oddly enough, Thrify had previously sued Texas Auto in Florida under the same contract back in 2002. Texas Auto's position was that Thrifty had "permanently waived" the forum selection clause by violating it back in 2002.

While the parties and the panel (Palmer, Pleus, Evander) agreed there was little case law, the conclusion was that litigation of arbitrable issues (or issues to which a forum selection clause would require a different venue) might support waiver of the arbitration/forum selection clause in subsequent proceedings IF the earlier litigation gave the party either (a) an unfair advantage or (b) prejudice to the other side.

Interestingly, the definition of "waiver" in this forum selection case came from Raymond James v. Saldukas, which defined waiver in the arbitration context. Thus, at least in the 5th DCA, waiver of a forum selection clause is the same as the standard used in the arbitration context. Notably, for waiver of arbitration, however, no prejudice is needed to be proven. Here, however, if the forum was waived in the past, it is not a permanent waiver unless there's an unfair advantage or prejudice. That may be a twist causing some issues in future cases.

Incidentally, exactly what's the difference between an "unfair advantage" and "prejudice"....?

Full post as published by Florida Arbitration Law on May 06, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0028 secs (from cache 10/31/26 22:26:13)