Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Arbitration & Mediation Blogs -> Florida Arbitration Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Arbitration & Mediation
: Florida Arbitration LawIs Waiver of a Forum Selection Clause a "Permanent Waiver" For Subsequent Disputes?
By Christopher B. Hopkins, Esq.
We last touched upon the question of waiver back in February with the discussion of the Estate of Orlanis v. Oakwood Terrace and Regents Park case involving waiver of the right to arbitrate. The Fifth District has now issued an opinion regarding the waiver of a forum selection clause, relying upon similar case authority.
In Texas Auto Mart, Inc. v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc., the parties got into a dispute over a lease and Texas Auto sued. Thrifty claimed that the venue was in another state under a mandatory forum selection clause. Trial court agreed even though, oddly enough, Thrify had previously sued Texas Auto in Florida under the same contract back in 2002. Texas Auto's position was that Thrifty had "permanently waived" the forum selection clause by violating it back in 2002.
While the parties and the panel (Palmer, Pleus, Evander) agreed there was little case law, the conclusion was that litigation of arbitrable issues (or issues to which a forum selection clause would require a different venue) might support waiver of the arbitration/forum selection clause in subsequent proceedings IF the earlier litigation gave the party either (a) an unfair advantage or (b) prejudice to the other side.
Interestingly, the definition of "waiver" in this forum selection case came from Raymond James v. Saldukas, which defined waiver in the arbitration context. Thus, at least in the 5th DCA, waiver of a forum selection clause is the same as the standard used in the arbitration context. Notably, for waiver of arbitration, however, no prejudice is needed to be proven. Here, however, if the forum was waived in the past, it is not a permanent waiver unless there's an unfair advantage or prejudice. That may be a twist causing some issues in future cases.
Incidentally, exactly what's the difference between an "unfair advantage" and "prejudice"....?
Full post as published by Florida Arbitration Law on May 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Worker's Compensation Laws Overview
Protect Workers From Injuries with plans that cover medical expenses and long-term or permanent disabilites
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
Employment
Employee rights including labor law, harassment, safety, unpaid overtime, discrimination and union disputes.
Mentor OB Tape
vaginal sling can allegedly various problems and even permanent injury.
Tainted Spinach
Family awarded settlement after two children became very ill after eating Natural Selection Foods spinach.
Signal International
allegedly lured foreign workers to US shipyards with false promises of permanent resident status.

Interesting Forum Selection Clause Case
CA1: another crack appeal waiver
Washington Supremes Hold that AT&T's Class Action Waiver is Unconscionable
Lone Star Supremes Enforce Waiver-of-Reliance Provision









