Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

KingCast says Good God Allmighty, Franconia Chief Montminy & Dan Mullen, Esq. knew all along about the Troy Watts, Esq. Bruce McKay Ethics Complaint.

By Christopher King

Attorney Watts never lied to me. He sent a copy to Chief Montminy and to Bruce McKay on or about 15 May 2006 and I have copies of the envelopes, yah.
Montminy: 7004 2890 0001 4105 6878

McKay: 7004 2890 0001 4105 6885

In the correspondence from Grafton DA Ricardo St. Hilaire that I will be reviewing tonight and scanning tomorrow a.m. at 9:00 sharp, three things jump right out at me:

First is the letter in which Attorney Watts notes that McKay has reneged on a written offer (emphasis in original) that a guilty plea would be offered in exchange for dismissing the DWI in exchange for a Reckless Op or Negligent Driving, with no additional loss of license and a letter from Sarah to be a "substantial and sincerely written apology outlining the errors of her behavior that [I] find acceptable." This is straight from the plea and explains why such a letter is in the file a-ha!

However McKay reneged on that and Attorney Watts threatened litigation but Sarah wanted to move on. "In the meantime, you should send this letter to your insurance carrier (Mullen) with a note that they brace themselves." Not to blame her for McKay's attitude and lawlessness, but if she (or others) had gone forward perhaps McKay and Liko Kenney would be alive today. They are not alive today but KingCast is most definitely going forward.

Second is the Attorney Watts' Motion to Suppress and it is something I said a long time ago if you run a word search for "epiphany + Sarah." Sorry I'm on the slow and busted-up 'puter tonight and I don't feel like dealing with linking until tomorrow.

26. What Corporal McKay did not do is offer any justification as to why he was asking the defendant out of her car. He did not ask her to step out for a sobriety test, and as stating in his report, there was no request to step out of her car for a sobriety test. On these facts, the only basis upon which he could have forced the defendant to leave her car involuntarily was if she was under arrest.

27. The Corporal, however, does not metion the word "arrest" in requiring of the defendant that she exit the vehicle.

Third, in Sarah's Affidavit she claimed that McKay gave her a pen and kept demanding she sign a document without telling her what it was and she couldn't read it well because of the OC Spray. He threatened her TWICE more in the holding cell with OC Spray: "He asked me to return the 'weapon'(the pen). I was again threatened again that I would be pepper sprayed, and 'this time it will be worse."

Documents Scan for Wednesday:
Envelopes one and two.
Complaint letter.
Plea offer.
Motion to Suppress.
Sarah Affidavit.
And whatever else I feel like.

*******

For the town nor Attorney Mullen to produce this documentation is legally and morally reprehensible and I will be going to the FBI when I complete my review of these matters. Newbies just coming in read the post directly below this.

Honestly, Chief no wonder you and Counsel Mullen are looking a tad raggedy in that top picture, in fact all Defense counsel looks beat up bad because you all knew what you were trying to cover up and that I was sharp enough to catch you at it. I point the finger at all of you con mucho gusto.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on May 06, 2008 (boomark / email).