ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation Support

: Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

LION?S ROAR BECOMES A CAT?S MEOW: QUALCOMM ATTORNEYS GET OFF EASY

ADVERTISEMENTS

First, thanks to all who wrote and were worried about me because I took a brief hiatus from blogging. Nothing was wrong ? far from it ? I was cruising the Caribbean with John, whose maritime background means he is always happiest when at sea. And since his happiness is mine, it was a delightful sojourn. I wish the hardest decision of every day was whether to order a Rumrunner or a Bahama Mama. But we?re back at the salt mines now . . . so onward to a story which broke while I was cheerfully basking in tropical climes . . .

In spite of all the court?s previous tough talk about the misdeeds of the Qualcomm counsel in the Qualcomm v. Broadcom case, the court wimped out in the end. Qualcomm had already been assessed a $8.5 million sanction to cover Broadcom?s attorneys fees and this decision added no further penalty to Qualcomm. As for the Qualcomm attorneys, most of the 19 attorneys who originally had to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed had no penalties at all assessed. There were no financial penalties and no requirement (as had been requested) that their misconduct be disclosed to current clients and courts in which they were admitted or had cases pending. Six of them had to send a letter to the California State Bar for possible investigation (do you imagine ANYONE in the State Bar didn?t know about their conduct before receiving any letter?) and eleven had to participate in something novel called a Case Review and Enforcement of Discovery Obligations (CREDO) program. This sort of amounts to ?homework? from the court in which the miscreants were to identify every juncture at which they ?went wrong? and set forth in some sort of grandiose memo, for the future, appropriate processes to ensure that something similar couldn?t happen again. Yeah, right.

Somehow, this limp-wristed reaction, which even Judge Major seems to go to great lengths to try to explain away, just doesn?t cut the mustard. Many commentators, myself included, had hoped for the brass knuckles and a decision that clearly signaled that these kind of discovery shenanigans would not be tolerated by the courts. Sigh. Maybe next time.

I?ll have another Bahama Mama please.

E-mail: snelson@senseient.com     Phone: 703-359-0700 

Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on January 15, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/04/26 01:01:30)