Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Maryland Intellectual Property Law BlogMaryland IP Litigation 2008: Lawsuit Summaries
By Brian Wm. Higgin
Below are summaries of recent IP-related lawsuits filed in the the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in 2008 (source: Justia).
- Magnus v. Association of Pet Dog Trainers, No. 8:2008cv00850; filed April 4, 2008; assigned to J. Williams
Plaintiff Vicki Lynn Magnus, a Waldorf, MD, resident, filed this declaratory judgment action against the Association of Pet Dog Trainers (APDT), a New Jersey company based in Greenville, SC. APDT allegedly owns the registered mark for its acronym name. According to her complaint, Magnus, a former member of APDT, created an Internet message board on December 1, 2003, "for discussion of issues of common interest" among other APDT members. Claiming the board was protected under the doctrine of fair use (copyright), the Lanham Act (trademark), and free speech under the First Amendment, Magnus received a cease and desist letter from APDT in 2006. When she objected, her membership was allegedly terminated "without cause." About the same time, APDT sent a "take down" letter to the Internet Service Provider and host of the message board, which complied with the request. Magnus is seeking relief in the form of a declaration that her use of the APDT acronym is lawful, noninfringing, and qualifies as a fair use.
- Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Theodosakis, No. 1:2008cv00879, filed April 7, 2008; assigned to J. Blake
Nutramax is a Maryland company based in Edgewood, MD. Defendants are Jason Theodosakis, M.D., and Supplement Testing Institute, Inc. (STI), which allegedly sell nutritional supplements, including those allegedly covered by U.S. Patent No. 6,797,289, for “Use of anabolic agents, anti-catabolic agents, antioxidant agents, and analgesics for protection, treatment and repair of connective tissues in humans and animals.” Claim 1 of the ‘289 patent covers a “synergistic combination of an aminosugar and avocado/soybean unsponifiables [ASU].” Nutramax sells Cosamin® ASU and Avoca ASU® under the '289 patent. This is the second lawsuit filed this year by Nutramax in which it asserts the '289 patent (see here).
- National Fallen Firefighters Foundation v. TWL Corp., No. 1:2008cv00896, April 9, 2008; assigned to J. Davis
This trademark infringement lawsuit involves the mark EVERYONE GOES HOME owned by NFFF, and defendants use of EVERYBODY GOES HOME in connection with a training simulation program.
- Bill Me Later, Inc. v. MODASolutions Corp., No. 1:2008cv00897, filed April 9, 2008; assigned to J. Blake
This trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition lawsuit involves the mark BILL ME LATER, allegedly owned by plaintiff, who is seeking monetary damages, and attorney's fee, among other relief, from Canada-based MODASolutions.
Full post as published by Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog on May 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Couple Awarded Nearly One Million Dollars in Lawsuit
Condo Lawsuit Gets $1 Million Award
abercrombie and fitch lawsuit
Abercrombie and Fitch Employment Discrimination Lawsuit
Further Settlements Reached in Kitec Lawsuit
Kitec Pumbing Further settlements reached in Defective Products Lawsuit

Two More Regional Trademark Law Blogs Worth Checking Out
Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 5/17/08
Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 2/17/08
Court of Appeals of Maryland to Hear Lead-Paint Lawsuit
ADF lawsuit challenges speech restrictions at U. of Maryland
City of Annapolis Settles Maryland Police Brutality Lawsuit


This trademark infringement lawsuit involves the mark EVERYONE GOES HOME owned by NFFF, and defendants use of EVERYBODY GOES HOME in connection with a training simulation program.
This trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition lawsuit involves the mark BILL ME LATER, allegedly owned by plaintiff, who is seeking monetary damages, and attorney's fee, among other relief, from Canada-based MODASolutions.






