Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Indignant Indigent

Public Defense

: Indignant Indigent

One Cannot Be Incarcerated For Violating The Terms Of Post Release Supervision Not Imposed By A Judge

After the Court of Appeals held that post relase supervisions sentences added by the Department of Corrections or by court personnel, other than judges are not validly imposed, but that resentencing was available in such cases for a court to lawflly impose such a sentnece (People v Sparber)the questioned remained whether persons charged with violating the terms of post release supervision not imposed by judges are entiled to immedite release. Today, in People of State of New York ex rel. Lucas Foote v Piscotti the

Fourth Department answered he questions with a clear yes:
Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding contending that the Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) lacked the authority to include a period of postrelease supervision in petitioner's sentence calculation because the sentencing court had not imposed a period of postrelease supervision. County Court erred in refusing to sustain the writ of habeas corpus based upon its conclusion that postrelease supervision was mandated by law and that nullification of postrelease supervision would render petitioner's sentence invalid. As the Court of Appeals has written, "[b]ecause CPL 380.20 and 380.40 collectively provide that only a judge may impose a [postrelease supervision] sentence, we conclude that DOCS may not do so" (Matter of Garner v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., ___ NY3d ___, ___ [Apr. 29, 2008]).

Thus, the Court ordered that Sheriff discharge petitioner from custody forthwith.

Full post as published by Indignant Indigent on May 23, 2008 (boomark / email).