Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousAppeals from the ITC
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
19 USC 1337 (Section 337) authorizes the International Trade Commission (ITC) to investigate complaints filed by owners of US patents against allegedly infringing imports. The ITC is run by a panel of six commissioners each serving a nine-year term.
One of the benefits of filing suit in the ITC is speed. Another benefit is its en rem jurisdiction used to block imports regardless of the location of the maker of the infringing product. Similarly, the ITC can issue broad exclusion orders against an entire product line even if some of the importers were not parties to the litigation. Finally, 271(g) is not a defense to patent infringement in ITC cases.
That said, the number of ITC cases filed each year is relatively small compared with the number of federal district cases. In 2007, for instance, 33 ITC investigations were initiated under Section 337. This number has been on the rise over the past decade.
ITC appeals to the CAFC have also been on the rise. The table below shows both the number of ITC appeals and the number of parties appealing (a single ITC action may investigate multiple accused infringers).

Notes:
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on December 17, 2007 (boomark / email).
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Links for 2008-06-01 [del.icio.us]
USPTO News: Patent Office to Publish New Appeals Rules on Tuesday
Blawg of the Day -- Tyler Appeals
USPTO News: New Appeals Rules Published
The PACER U.S. Party Case Index Now Includes All Federal District and Bankruptcy Courts







