Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Times Public Editor Says Columnist Was Wrong On Obama As Apostate

By Howard M. Friedman

Today's New York Times carries a piece by Public Editor Clark Hoyt criticizing a May 12 op-ed by Edward N. Luttwak titled President Apostate? The Public Editor wrote:

ON May 12, The Times published an Op-Ed article by Edward N. Luttwak, a military historian, who argued that any hopes that a President Barack Obama might improve relations with the Muslim world were unrealistic because Muslims would be ?horrified? once they learned that Obama had abandoned the Islam of his father and embraced Christianity as a young adult.

Under ?Muslim law as it is universally understood,? Luttwak wrote, Obama was born a Muslim, and his ?conversion? to Christianity was an act of apostasy, a capital offense and ?the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit.?

..... Did Luttwak cross the line from fair argument to falsehood? Did Times editors fail to adequately check his facts before publishing his article? Did The Times owe readers a contrasting point of view?

I interviewed five Islamic scholars, at five American universities, recommended by a variety of sources as experts in the field. All of them said that Luttwak?s interpretation of Islamic law was wrong.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on June 01, 2008 (boomark / email).