Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Recording Industry vs The PeopleRIAA files new action against Cassin family after dismissing 'making available' action, Warner v. Does 1-4
By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman
As noted yesterday, in Warner v. Cassin, the "making available" case that had been pending in Westchester, the RIAA voluntarily dismissed the case, giving no notice to the defendant's lawyer. Defendant's lawyer learned of it on June 11th, although it had been filed May 27th.
Today, June 12th, defendant's lawyer learned that on June 4th the RIAA commenced yet another action against the same family over the same exact allegation of copyright infringement, this time suing "Does 1-4". The name of the new case is Warner v. Does 1-4. The RIAA did not disclose to the Court, in the new case, that it was "related" to Warner v. Cassin. As a result, the new case was assigned to another judge, Hon. Charles L. Brieant.
Additionally, in the new action, plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion for discovery.
Defendant's lawyer wrote to Judge Robinson, advising him of what had occurred, and requesting that he recall his previous order and issue a new order making it clear that the dismissal in Warner v. Cassin was "on the merits" and "with prejudice", since that case was the second action involving this identical claim (the first being the Washington DC action in which Ms. Cassin was sued as a "Doe").
Defendant's lawyer also wrote to Judge Brieant, explaining the background, asking him to mark the case as "related" to Warner v. Cassin, asking him to refer the matter back to Judge Robinson, and arguing that the plaintiffs had filed the new case in order to:
-engage in forum shopping;
-do an end-run around the impending decision of the dismissal motion; and
-do an end-run around the stay of discovery.
[Ed. note. (1) You just can't make this stuff up. (2) Guess what the new complaint says about "making available"? Answer: nothing. -R.B.]
Complaint, Warner v. Does 1-4*
Motion for discovery*
Declaration of Laurie Rust*
Declaration of Carlos Linares*
Ex parte orders from other cases*
June 12, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (re recall of previous order)*
June 12, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Charles L. Brieant (re referral of related case)*
June 12, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (re letter to Judge Brieant)*
* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation
Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property
Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on June 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Lehman Brothers
Bankrupt, Files Chapter 11
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Condemned Redevelopment
City of Baltimore agrees to $7.8 million property use dispute settlement with Warner Street Inc.
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
Family of Car Accident Awarded $35 Million
Family of Car Accident Awarded $35 Million
$15 Million Settlement Awarded to Family of Plane Crash Victim
$15 Million Settlement Awarded to Family of Plane Crash Victim

Court Dismisses RIAA Class Action
Part of Whirpool's ITC action against LG dropped
RIAA Faces Potential Class Action Over Tactics
The day the music died: US record industry sues man for ripping own CDs to computer
D. Az.: Making Available Isnt Infringement









