ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Discriminations

A Decision That Smells Like Rotten Fish

ADVERTISEMENTS

Is this where we?re headed? Where President Obama will take us if he can?

The ?this? to which I refer is a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada holding that ?[g]iving exclusive commercial fishing licences to aboriginal groups? does not discriminate against non-aboriginal fishermen.

Why not? Well, because it?s ?affirmative action.?

In its decision, the court acknowledged the program ?has a detrimental effect on non-aboriginal commercial fishers? and ?that the disadvantage is related to racial differences,? but found the program falls under the section of the charter [the the Charter of Rights and Freedoms] that protects affirmative action programs from constitutional challenges....

The charter section in question ? section 15(2) ? gives governments the right to implement a program that ?has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups?

Our Constitution, to the dismay of liberals and Democrats, is much more old-fashioned, speaking as it does not of ?amelioration? but of the quaint concept of ?equal protection,? a concept that its adherents (now pretty much limited to rubes, small towners, most Republicans, many Democrats who are not elected office holders or party officials, and most people not employed by a university or in positions of responsibility in large corporations or the media) revere because it derives from the even more fundamental core value that every individual American has a right to be treated by the state ?without regard? to race, creed, color, or national origin.

But not to worry. The libs/Dems don?t need a Canadian-style Constitution. All they need is a president who will appoint judges who will ?construe? the Constitution we have to reach a Canadian result.

ADDENDUM

A good example of a Supreme Court Justice who has no trouble reading our Constitution as though it were written in Canadian can be found here.

Full post as published by Discriminations on June 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.015 secs (new cache)