ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

Using Industry Statistics To Sell Business Opportunities

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Apex Building, headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission, on Constitution Avenue and 17th Streets in Washington, D.C.. The building was designed by Edward H. Bennett under the purview of Secretary of the Treasury Andrew W. Mellon, and was completed in 1938 at a cost of $125 million.

Image via Wikipedia

Lance Winslow, a colourful character who has battled the FTC a number of times, writes on his blog about the use of Industry Statistics and the new FTC Biz Op Rule
"In the past many business opportunity sellers would use industry specific statistics on their Web sites, brochures and even in videos, which they would mail to potential buyers.

The Federal Trade Commission looked into this and found that many business opportunity sellers overused these figures to sell their wares.

In the future this tactic of using industry statistics may become illegal and considered fraudulent due to a proposed rule that the Federal Trade Commission is considering which would govern business opportunities.

In the rule business opportunity sellers would have to prove and have records to prove that the statistics they use are actual statistics of people who bought their particular business opportunity."

What the FTC is trying to prevent is the anchoring, the well known psychological disposition to give too much significance to industry numbers.

For example, suppose that you were told that the payphone business is a $12 billion business, and that "on average" each payphone is used for a 50 cent call once every 2 hours. Is .1% of this $12 billion market worth $3,000 per payphone, if on average the payphone will earn $12 per day?

The mathematical answer is that 12 * 365 is greater than 3,000 and so the payphone will pay for itself within a year.

Even if you believe that the payphone is only used every 4 hours or every 8 hours, then the pay back period is 2 or 4 years. Not bad and certainly reasonable.

Unfortunately, this reasoning is an example of anchoring on the first number: the payphone is used every 2 hours. The real number might be, for a certain location, once a week - dramatically altering the real value of the deal.

Good for the FTC for paying attention to some of the new behavioral economics.

Zemanta Pixie

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on June 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (new cache)