Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Seattle Trademark LawyerUse of Same Trademark for a Different Product Didn't Infringe Registered Mark
By Michael Atkins
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Ninth Circuit yesterday clarified what it takes for the owner of a federally registered trademark to succeed in an infringement action against another user of the mark in connection with goods or services that are different than those specified in the owner’s trademark registration.Applied Information Sciences Corp. owns the registered trademark SMARTSEARCH for certain computer-related functions, and claimed that eBay, Inc. uses the same SMARTSEARCH mark for its Internet read more
Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on December 30, 2007 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Trademark Guide: What is an Incontestable Trademark
Trademark Guide: Federal Versus State Registration
Registered Trademark for Software Product Can Extend to Internet Uses
Trademark Registration of Domain Names
Trademark Guide: Why do I Need to Police My Trademark
A Business Owners Guide to Trademarks: Trademark Registration









