Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael GeistThe CWTA Response
By Michael Geist
ADVERTISEMENTS
Yesterday I posted a link to the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association's letter to the editor responding to my recent text-message column. The letter claims that my comment that "consumers pay more, but get less" is inaccurate. Yet consider the claims made in the letter:"recent figures from Merrill Lynch confirm that Canadians' wireless talk time continues to increase, and continued growth in wireless data usage now accounts for approximately 40 per cent of the average monthly cellphone bill."
In actual fact, the Merrill Lynch study says that 12.4 percent of revenues come from data in Canada. By comparison, in the U.S. it is 18 percent, in the UK it is 25.5 percent, and in Japan it is 32 percent. Canadians use far less data than consumers in most other developed countries because our prices are higher.
"the average revenue per user has remained relatively static."
The Merrill Lynch study finds that ARPU increased in Canada by 3.7 percent. Among developed countries, only Sweden had a higher increase, with 17 of 23 countries surveyed showing a decrease in ARPU (signs of a competitive market). Moreover, Canada has the second highest ARPU in the world (only Ireland has higher) and Canada has by-far the highest wireless profit margin in the developed world.
None of it will come as a surprise to Canadian consumers who experience the effects of one of the world's least competitive wireless markets every month. Indeed, it does not come as a surprise to Merrill Lynch either, who note in their report that "price competition has been concentrated in the mid-market and corporate segments more than at the entry level (where it would help to increase affordability for the entry-level consumer)."
Full post as published by Michael Geist on August 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

AFL-CIO Proxy Voting: A Response by Agrawal
Australian Government response to financial crisis
Situational Response Training Scheduled This Week www.privateofficer.com
National Response Framework Released
Queensland Government response to FOI review








