Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Estate Planning
: Toronto Estate Law BlogRULE 38.10 - TRIAL OF AN ISSUE
By Hull & Hull LLP
Many estate litigation proceedings start by way of an application. However, from a practical and legal standpoint, contentious applications should be converted to a trial of an issue(s). Where the parties agree that credibility is at the heart of an application, a trial is warranted. Rule 38.10(1) states:
On the hearing of an application, the presiding judge may… order that the whole application or any issue proceed to trial...
In the normal course, once an application is converted to a trial of an issue, the court orders directions regarding the procedure to be followed by the parties (i.e. an order for directions).
In Gordon Glaves Holdings Ltd. v. Care Corp. of Canada (1998)[1][1], the Ontario Divisional Court considered the test to convert an application to a trial of issues:
The general rule is that the court will not determine genuine issues of credibility on the hearing of an application. Such issues should be decided at trial by the trier of fact [Citations Omitted/Emphasis Added]. In my opinion, the central issues in this case could not properly be determined without a trial, because they depended on questions of credibility.
Proceeding by way of a trial of a trial of an issue, which requires oral testimony, will allow a judge to “eyeball” witnesses and decided who ultimately to believe.
Recently, I was involved in a proceeding that alleged a secret trust. It was commenced by way of an application, but after some resistance from opposing counsel, the application was converted to a trial of an issue. In the end, the application could not properly be determined without a court deciding: (a) exactly what the deceased said to the alleged trustee and beneficiary (if anything); (b) what the parties understood the deceased to mean; and (c) what steps the parties did or did not take regarding the alleged secret trust. The court would have to decide “who to believe” and the parties’ credibility was clearly on the line. Pursuant to Rule 38.10, the application was converted to a trial of issues and an order for directions issued.
Thanks for reading. Enjoy the dying days of summer.
Joi gin (Cantonese for good-bye)
Justin
Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on August 15, 2008 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

District Court May Not Grant New Trial On Ground Not Raised in Defendant's Rule 33 Motion
Clarification Needed of Amendments to Rule 1925
Motion for Award of Costs and Fees is Not a Post-Judgment Motion Pursuant to Rule 59
Judgment Which Did Not Address Issue Joined by Parties Was Not Final
Summary Judgment Sustained On Argument Trial Court Did Not Consider








