Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> LawPundit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: LawPunditCollege Football Game Predictions Weekend of August 28, 2008
By Andis Kaulins
| College Football Game Matchups August 23 to September 1, 2008 (visitor v. home) Game below played on August 30 unless otherwise stated. The figure after each team is our rating for that team. NR means not rated in top 250 SPRS Ratings. The dash means minus, so that a rating of -4.0 is 3 worse than -1.0. A one point SPRS rating difference means 9 points on the scoreboard. | Betting Line (+ means home team is favored) College Football Prediction Tracker August 18, 2008 | Our Line and Predicted Score based on our SPRS RATINGS & RANKINGS | Actual Score | Win Loss vs. Winner | Win Loss vs. Spread |
| Fort Valley State (NR) v. Valdosta State -2.3 (August 23) | -- | +48 pts :: 0-48 | 3-56 | W | -- |
| Idaho -5.4 v. Arizona -1.1 | + 28 | +41 pts :: 7-48 A 1-point difference in SPRS ratings equals 9 points on the scoreboard so that Idaho rated -5.4 and Arizona -1.1 or a difference of 4.3, multiplied by 9 = 38.7. In addition, we use Sagarin's calculated home field advantage of 2.58 so that the full spread is 41.28 points. For ease of calculation we use 2.6. instead of 2.58. | |||
| Temple -4.6 v. Army -4.6 (August 29) | -7 | +3 pts :: 21-24 Our SPRS system rates these teams equal at -4.6, so we give the edge to the home team by 2.6 (or a field goal) +3 pts | |||
| Louisiana-Monroe -3.2 v. Auburn -0.7 | +27 | 2.5 x 9 = 22.5 pts + 2.6 home field advantage = +25 pts (BUT, Auburn has a new offensive coordinator who we think is worth 10 points more, so that we increase the spread to +35 pts :: 7-42 | |||
| Wake Forest -1.2 v. Baylor -4.0 (August 28) | -12.5 | 2.8 x 9 = 25.2 - 2.6 home field advantage = -23 pts :: 30-7 | |||
| UTEP -4.5 v. Buffalo -4.0 (August 28) | +3 | 0.5 x 9 = 4.5 + 2.6 = +7 pts :: 35-42 | |||
| Michigan State -1.4 v. California -0.5 | +6 | 0.9 x 9 = 8.1 + 2.6 = +11 pts :: 30-41 | |||
| Alabama -1.5 v. Clemson -0.3 | +5.5 | 1.2 x 9 = 10.8 +2.6 = +13 pts :: 21-34 (Saban's Alabama will be better this year but no one knows yet how much, so in spite of the stats, this may be a tough game to call) | |||
| Colorado -2.3 v. Colorado St. -3.4 (August 31) | -11.5 | 1.1 x 9 = 9.9 -2.6 = -7 pts :: 34-27 | |||
| Virginia Tech -0.3 v. East Carolina -2.3 | -10 | 2.0 x 9 = 19 - 2.6 = -16 pts :: 30-14 | |||
| Hawaii -0.1 v. Florida +0.8 | +34.5 | 0.9 x 9 = 8.1 + 2.6 = +11 pts :: 38-49 | |||
| Western Kentucky -3.3 v. Indiana -2.1 | +21 | 1.2 x 9 = 10.8 + 2.6 = +13 pts :: 20-33 | |||
| Florida Intl. -5.5 v. Kansas +0.8 | +36.5 | 6.3 x 9 = 56.7 + 2.6 = +59 pts :: 0-59 | |||
| North Texas -5.7 v. Kansas State -1.7 | +25 | 4.0 x 9 = 36 + 2.6 = +39 pts :: 3-42 | |||
| Boston College -0.1 v. Kent State - 4.3 | -10 | 3.3 x 9 = 29.7 - 2.6 = -27 pts :: 34-7 | |||
| Mississippi St. -1.9 v. Louisiana Tech -4.1 | -9 | 2.2 x 9 = 19.2 - 2.6 = -17 pts :: 31-14 | |||
| Kentucky -0.9 v. Louisville -1.9 (August 31) | +5 | 1.0 x 9 = 9 - 2.6 = -6 pts :: 27-21 | |||
| Vanderbilt -2.0 v. Miami (Ohio) -3.1 (August 28) | +3.5 | 1.1 x 9 = 9.9 - 2.6 = -7 pts :: 17-10 | |||
| Utah -1.4 v. Michigan -0.9 | +4 | 0.5 x 9 = 4.5 + 2.6 = +7 pts :: 17-24 | |||
| Troy State -1.8 v. Middle Tennessee -3.4 (August 28) | -6.5 | 1.6 x 9 = 14.4 - 2.6 = -12 pts :: 41-29 | |||
| Northern Illinois -5.1 v. Minnesota -4.5 | +8.5 | 0.6 x 9 = 5.4 + 2.6 = +8 pts :: 36-44 | |||
| Memphis -4.3 v. Mississippi -2.3 | +9.5 | 2.0 x 9 = 18 + 2.6 = +21 pts :: 21-42 | |||
| Illinois - 0.6 v. Missouri + 0.4 | +8.5 | 1.0 x 9 = 9 +2.6 = +12 pts :: 33-45 | |||
| Western Michigan -4.0 v. Nebraska -1.5 | +14 | 2.5 x 9 = 22.5 + 2.6 = +25 pts We do not understand the official spread here as even last season's performance would warrant a 4 TD difference, and with the AD and coaching changes of the Huskers under Osborne and Pelini, we think that is worth another 2 TDs, so that we make the spread here +39 points :: 13-52 | |||
| TCU -1.7 v. New Mexico -1.6 | -6.5 | 0.1 x 9 = 0.9 + 2.6 = +3 pts :: 14-17 | |||
| Syracuse -4.3 v. Northwestern -2.6 | +12 | 1.7 x 9 = 15.3 + 2.6 = +18 pts :: 20-38 | |||
| Washington -2.6 v. Oregon -0.2 | +14 | 2.4 x 9 = 21.6 + 2.6 = +24 pts :: 17-41 | |||
| Bowling Green -3.3 v. Pittsburgh -1.5 | +12 | 1.8 x 9 = 16.2 + 2.6 = +19 pts :: 17-36 | |||
| SMU -5.2 v. Rice (August 29) -5.5 | +3 | 0.3 x 9 = 2.7 - 2.6 = 0 points so we give the advantage to the home team +1 pts :: 35-36 | |||
| Fresno State -1.9 v. Rutgers (September 1) -0.4 | +5.5 | 1.5 x 9 = 13.5 + 2.6 = + 16 pts :: 14-30 | |||
| NC State -2.4 v. South Carolina -1.2 (August 28) | +11 | 1.2 x 9 = 10.8 + 2.6 = +13 pts :: 21-34 | |||
| Louisiana-Lafayette -3.4 v. Southern Miss -3.4 | +11 | 0 x 9 = 0, the teams are even, +2.6 home field = +3 pts :: 24-27 | |||
| Oregon State -0.7 v. Stanford -3.3 (August 28) | -3 | 2.6 x 9 = 23.4 - 2.6 = -21 pts :: 35-14 | |||
| Florida Atlantic -2.2 v. Texas -0.1 | +23.5 | 2.3 x 9 = 20.7 +2.6 = +23 pts but the new defensive coordinator from Auburn is worth 7 at least so that we call it +30 pts :: 7-37 | |||
| Arkansas State -3.5 v. Texas A&M -2.0 | +20 | 1.5 x 9 = 13.5 +2.6 = +16 pts :: 17-33 | |||
| Tulsa -1.5 v. UAB -5.4 | -14.5 | 3.9 x 9 = 35.1 - 2.6 = -33 pts :: 60-27 (the nation's best offense meets one of the nation's worst defenses) | |||
| Tennessee -0.8 v. UCLA -1.4 (September 1) | -6 | 0.6 x 9 = 5.4 - 2.6 = -3 pts :: 20-17 | |||
| Utah State -5.1 v. UNLV -3.7 | +12.5 | 1.4 x 9 = 12.6 + 2.6 = +15 pts :: 27-42 | |||
| USC (Southern Cal) +0.9 v. Virginia -1.3 | -19.5 | 2.2 x 9 = 19.2 - 2.6 = -17 pts :: 14-31 | |||
| Oklahoma State -0.9 v. Washington State -1.5 | -6 | 0.6 x 9 = 5.4 - 2.6 = -3 pts :: 34-31 | |||
| Akron -4.0 v. Wisconsin -1.6 | +26 | 2.4 x 9 = 21.6 +2.6 = +24 pts :: 7-31 | |||
| Ohio -3.8 v. Wyoming -2.7 | +10 | 1.1 x 9 = 9.9 +2.6 = +13 pts :: 7-20 | |||
| Eastern Illinois -5.2 v. Central Michigan -2.8 (August 28) | 2.4 x 9 = 21.6 +2.6 = +24 pts :: 24-48 | ||||
| Indiana State NR v. Eastern Michigan -5.1 (August 28) | +14 pts :: 21-35 | ||||
| Northeastern -4.9 v. Ball State -3.1 (August 28) | 1.8 x 9 = 16.2 - 2.6 = +19 pts :: 20-39 | ||||
| Eastern Kentucky -4.5 v. Cincinnati -0.8 (August 28) | 3.7 x 9 = 33.3 - 2.6 = +36 pts :: 13-49 | ||||
| Jacksonville St. NR v. Georgia Tech -1.7 (August 28) | +45 pts :: 7-52 | ||||
| Charleston S. NR v. Miami of Florida -2.2 (August 28) | +42 pts :: 6-48 | ||||
| Hofstra -3.1 v. Connecticut - 1.9 (August 28) | 1.2 x 9 = 10.8 - 2.6 = +13 pts :: 23-36 | ||||
| South Dakota State -3.3 v. Iowa State - 3.7 (August 28) | 0.4 x 9 = 3.6 - 2.6 = -1 pts :: 24-23 | ||||
| August 28 | |||||
| Shorter NR v. Western Carolina - 5.8 | +14 pts :: 17-31 | ||||
| Henderson St. - 4.6 v. Central Arkansas - 4.7 | 0.1 x 9 = 0.9 - 2.6 = +2 pts :: 28-30 | ||||
| Texas A&M Kingsville NR v. North Dakota - 1.8 | +45 pts :: 10-55 | ||||
| Austin Peay NR v. North Dakota St. - 1.4 | +49 pts :: 7-56 | ||||
| Gardner-Webb -4.4 v. Tennessee Tech | -14 pts :: 37-23 | ||||
| Montana-Western - 5.1 v. Weber St. -4.4 | 0.7 x 9 = 6.3 + 2.6 = +9 pts :: 17-26 | ||||
| August 29 | |||||
| Marist NR v. San Diego -4.5 | +17 pts :: 14-31 | ||||
| August 30 | |||||
| Maine -4.9 v. Iowa -2.4 | 2.5 x 9 = 22.5 + 2.6 = +25 pts :: 10-35 | ||||
| Youngstown St. - 3.6 v. Ohio State +1.2 | 4.8 x 9 = 43.2 + 2.6 = +46 pts :: 3-49 | ||||
| Coastal Carolina NR v. Penn State -0.7 | +50 pts :: 7-57 | ||||
| Georgia Southern - 3.1 v. Georgia + 0.3 | 3.4 x 9 = 30.6 + 2.6 = +33 pts :: 7-40 | ||||
| Monmouth NR v. Rhode Island - 5.9 | +14 pts :: 20-34 | ||||
| Southern Utah -5.7 v. Air Force -1.4 | 4.3 x 9 = 38.7 +2.6 = +41 pts :: 10-51 | ||||
| SE Louisiana - 5.8 v. Alcorn State NR | -14 pts :: 28-14 | ||||
| Adams State NR v. Montana State -4.6 | +14 pts :: 17-31 | ||||
| Villanova -3.3 v. West Virginia +1.2 | 4.5 x 9 = 40.5 + 2.6 = +43 pts :: 6-49 | ||||
| Towson -5.2 v. Navy -2.9 | 2.3 x 9 = 20.7 + 2.6 = +23 pts :: 26-49 | ||||
| Delaware -2.5 v. Maryland -2.1 | 0.4 x 9 = 3.6 + 2.6 = +6 pts :: 28-34 | ||||
| Western Oregon - 4.6 v. Portland St. - 5.2 | 0.6 x 9 = 5.4 - 2.6 = -3 pts :: 38-35 | ||||
| Illinois State - 5.1 v. Marshall - 3.5 | 1.6 x 9 = 14.4 + 2.6 = +17 pts :: 24-41 | ||||
| Appalachian State - 1.6 v. LSU + 0.9 | 2.5 x 9 = 22.5 + 2.6 = +25 pts :: 30-55 | ||||
| McNeese State - 2.7 v. North Carolina -2.0 | 0.7 x 9 = 6.3 + 2.6 = +9 pts :: 24-33 | ||||
| Albany -5.5 v. Massachusetts -1.5 | 4.0 x 9 = 36 - 2.6 = +39 pts :: 10-49 | ||||
| Mars Hill NR v. Furman - 3.9 | +30 pts :: 14-44 | ||||
| Northern Iowa - 1.9 v. BYU -0.2 | 1.7 x 9 = 15.3 +2.6 = +18 pts :: 7-25 | ||||
| S. Carolina St. - 3.2 v. UCF - 1.5 | 1.7 x 9 = 15.3 + 2.6 = +18 pts = 24-42 | ||||
| Colgate - 5.0 v. Stony Brook - 5.1 | 0.1 x 9 = 0.9 - 2.6 = +2 pts :: 31-33 | ||||
| Virginia St. NR v. Norfolk St. - 5.8 | +14 pts :: 14-28 | ||||
| Southern - 5.2 v. Houston - 2.7 | 2.5 x 9 = 22.5 - 2.6 = +25 pts :: 17-42 | ||||
| Richmond - 2.5 v. Elon - 3.6 | 1.1 x 9 = 9.9 - 2.6 = -7 pts :: 24-17 | ||||
| Chattanooga - 4.8 v. Oklahoma + 0.8 | 5.6 x 9 = 50.4 + 2.6 = +53 pts :: 6-59 | ||||
| Eastern Washington -3.0 v. Texas Tech +0.2 | 3.2 x 9 = 28.8 +2.6 = +31 pts :: 20-51 | ||||
| Tennessee St. -5.9 v. Alabama A&M -4.8 | 1.1 x 9 = 9.9 + 2.6 = +13 pts :: 27-40 | ||||
| Webber v. Citadel -3.4 | +35 pts :: 7-42 | ||||
| North Greenville NR v. Liberty - 3.5 | +35 pts :: 13-48 | ||||
| East Central NR v. Sam Houston St. - 4.2 | +28 pts :: 14 -42 | ||||
| Angelo St. NR v. Texas St. - 6.1 | +14 pts :: 17-31 | ||||
| James Madison -2.2 v. Duke - 4.2 | 2.0 x 9 = 18 - 2. 6 = -15 pts. :: 35-20 | ||||
| Western Illinois -3.3 v. Arkansas + 0.1 | 3.4 x 9 = 30.6 + 2.6 = +33 pts :: 14-47 | ||||
| Presbyterian -6.1 v. Wofford -3.1 | 3.0 x 9 = 27 +2.6 = +30 pts :: 14-44 | ||||
| Tenn-Martin -5.7 v. South Florida -0.4 | 5.3 x 9 = 47.7 + 2.6 = +50 pts :: 9-59 | ||||
| St. Ambrose NR v. South Dakota - 2.5 | +49 pts :: 7-56 | ||||
| Texas Southern NR v. Prairie View A&M - 5.6 | +14 pts :: 21-35 | ||||
| UC Davis -4.8 v. San Jose St. -3.5 | 1.3 x 9 = 11.7 + 2.6 = +14 pts :: 23-37 | ||||
| Idaho St. - 6.4 v. Boise St. - 1.7 | 4.7 x 9 = 42.3 + 2.6 = +45 pts :: 7-52 | ||||
| Grambling St. -4.7 v. Nevada -3.0 | 1.7 x 9 = 15.3 + 2.6 = +18 pts :: 24-42 | ||||
| Cal Poly -3.7 v. San Diego St. - 3.6 | 0.1 x 9 = 0.9 + 2.6 = 3 pts :: 34-36 | ||||
| Northern Arizona -4.6 v. Arizona St. -0.6 | 4.0 x 9 = 36 + 2.6 = +39 pts :: 14-53 | ||||
| August 31 | |||||
| Jackson State -4.4 v. Hampton - 6.0 | 1.6 x 9 = 14.4 - 2.6 = -12 pts :: 33-21 | ||||
| Fayetville St. NR v. N.C. Central NR | |||||
| Dayton - 4.4 v. Central St. NR | -21 pts :: 35-14 |
Full post as published by LawPundit on August 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Football-Related Dementia and Workers' Compensation
Football-Related Dementia Is the NFL Liable?
International Game Technology
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
NCAA
Men's Basketball, Football Players Settle Class Action for $228 Million
Nintendo Control
Video game giant to pay $21 million settlement in patent lawsuit.
Alta College
Settles False Claims Allegatiions for $7 Million
Music Teacher
College of the Desert agrees to $660,000 discrimination and retaliation settlement.

Friedmans fearless football forecast
Clownfish's football picks, Part Dos
First law of weddings and football
College Football's First Weekend
The importance of recruiting classes









