ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

The Stock Market is a Ponzi

ADVERTISEMENTS
Plot of S&P Composite Real Price-Earnings Rati...

Image via Wikipedia

Mark Cuban, writing at his blog, confirms that we can model the stock market as if it were a Ponzi scheme.

"I've said a lot of this before.

The stock market is by definition a ponzi scheme.

As long as money keeps on coming in, then there is someone to take the stocks from the sellers. If the amount of money coming in is reduced, the stocks, indexes, et al go down.

What if, for who knows whatever reason, the amount of money going into stocks declined significantly ? Who would buy stock from the sellers.

I mean goodness gracious, you could see something disastrous happen.

Like the Nasdaq dropping from 5000, to under 2000 in just a few years.

Its happened before, it can happen again."

The reason that this is important is that we tend to think that although the stock market may border on irrational, it is not inherently a criminal exercise.

But what if it were?  What would it look like?  How much differently would it appear to us?

The reason for this type of counter-factual thinking is well understood by scientists, philosophers, and indeed anyone who models the social world: let us assume that world is completely different than we assume it to be, deduce phenomena that would appear in the far away world, and then see just how close we are to the supposed far away counter-factual world.

We are fortunate too have a number of excellent books on Charles Ponzi, his own diary, and years of bubbles to study.

One feature of Charle's Ponzi scheme was his payment to his salesmen.  For every $100 scrip they sold, they were immediately paid $10.

Ten dollars was a lot of money.  It basically signaled the huge risk involved in taking a long position in Ponzi's SEC.

Ask yourself: are the bid/ask spreads in the purchase of sub-prime mortgages both reasonable and transparent?

If not, you just might be dealing with a Ponzi.  

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on September 08, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0153 secs (new cache)