Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: Las Vegas Trademark AttorneyWine and Dine Corporation Files (and then Withdraws) $250 million Cybersquatting Lawsuit
By Ryan Gile
On September 19, 2008, Wine and Dine Corporation filed a $250 million lawsuit against MDNH, Inc., Marchex, Inc. and Brendhan Hight in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. See Wine and Dine Corporation v. MDNH, Inc. et al, Case No. 08-cv-01259 (D. Nev.)
Unfortunately, I can?t provide my usual level of details on the lawsuit because it turns out that the lawsuit was administratively terminated today and the complaint no longer available on PACER. The docket indicates it was terminated on the basis that the case was "opened in error by counsel."
Of course, in the fast-paced world of the Internet, it didn?t take long for news of this lawsuit to start generating buzz amongst those websites and forums that monitor and discuss domain-name related stories and lawsuits. See, for example, here and here .
What we can glean is that Wine and Dine (or more accurately Wine and Dine Properties Ltd.) owns the federal registered mark WINE & DINE for magazines in the field of food and spirits ? registered since 1995 (with date of first use as early as September 24, 1993). The company publishes the online magazine Wine and Dine. As for MDNH, it is the named owner of the website http://www.wineanddine.com/, which was originally purchase in August 2000 and is currently just set up as a web-directory website with the typical pay-per-click links (courtesy of Marchex). Brendhan Hight is the named registrant contact for the domain.
Thus, the lawsuit would appear to be your standard cybersquatting lawsuit (except for the $250 million request for damages). But unless someone out there was able to nab a copy of the complaint before it was removed, I guess we?ll never know ? unless the lawsuit is filed again.
[Full Disclosure: My current law firm has performed some services related to trademark maintenance and assignments on behalf of a company that previously owned the subject mark.]
Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on September 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Lehman Brothers
Bankrupt, Files Chapter 11
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Wachovia Corporation WB Securities Fraud
Wachovia Corporation WB
Western Canada Lottery Corporation
Faces $100 Million Class Action
Couple Awarded Nearly One Million Dollars in Lawsuit
Condo Lawsuit Gets $1 Million Award
Toy Recall
RC2 Corporation agrees to $30 million Thomas and Friends lead paint contamination class action settlement.

Dell Files Cybersquatting Lawsuit against Domain Name Companies
Bob Marley's "WAILERS" Win Cybersquatting Lawsuit
Presidential Debate: Is this Cybersquatting or Not








