Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

NH AG Kelly Ayotte and James Kennedy paint themselves into another corner on their Surreply Contra KingCast Motion for Costs.

By Christopher King

May it please the Court: My brother and sister painted themselves in a corner, by earlier saying that KingCast is not entitled to court costs from them because the Deadly Force Protocol that they provided on the eve of our 10 January 2008 hearing was just a nicety, given to Petitioner "just to be on the safe side," or words of similar and virtually identical import. They were ostensibly not providing the Protocol because it didn't pertain to the case because Bruce McKay never fired his weapon.

But Bruce McKay most assuredly DID fire his weapon, or Gregory W. Floyd and Respondent Ayotte are lying or incorrect about the number of times Floyd fired his weapon, and where he was standing and if he spoke to Liko Kenney because there is no other explanation for the windshield bullet: If Floyd was standing at car side talking with Liko that bullet doesn't happen. We must -- repeat must take AG Ayotte at her word for the purposes of this argument because her integrity is on the line and she would never set forth a false statement pursuant to principles of Candor Toward the Tribunal, Rule 3.3.

So as Respondent is telling the Truth about Floyd, then the windshield bullet did in fact come from McKay and Attorney Ayotte willfully misled this Honorable Court into making its ruling that Respondent acted reasonably in providing the Deadly Force Protocol. As such.....[snip] read comments.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on September 23, 2008 (boomark / email).