Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal: Featured Columnists September 25, 2008

By David Badertscher, PLL

<font size="1"> <p><font size="2">If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed.</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.nylj.com" target="_blank"><font size="2">http://www.nylj.com</font></a><font size="2"> </font></p> <p><font size="2">Subscription required for online access unless otherewise noted:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCSRQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVD" target="_blank"><font size="2">Antitrust</font></a><br/><font size="2">Thursday, September 25, 2008<br/>By Elai Katz<br/><br/>" Elai Katz, a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, reviews recent developments of interest, including a Seventh Circuit decision holding that, in jointly licensing their logos, professional football teams acted as a single entity incapable of forming an agreement in restraint of trade while the Second Circuit decided that a similar joint licensing arrangement for professional baseball teams was not an unreasonable restraint of trade and was appropriately judged under the rule of reason." </font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCSRQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSR" target="_blank"><font size="2">Condemnation and Tax Certiorari</font></a><br/><font size="2">Thursday, September 25, 2008<br/>By M. Robert Goldstein and Michael Rikon<br/><br/>"M. Robert Goldstein and Michael Rikon, partners of Goldstein, Goldstein, Rikon & Gottlieb, write that the chickens are coming home to roost after an unfortunate result coming from the interpretation of a condominium's bylaws in the partial taking of a gated community on Long Island by the Appellate Dvision, Second Department."</font></p> <p><font size="2">OUTSIDE COUNSEL:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCSRQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSA" target="_blank"><font size="2">Expatriate Pacts and Cross-Border Restrictive Covenants</font></a><br/><font size="2">Thursday, September 25, 2008<br/>By Donald C. Dowling Jr.<br/><br/>" Donald C. Dowling Jr., international employment counsel at White & Case, writes that there are three general rules that almost always determine which country's employment laws apply to expatriates and other border-crossing employees. However, while these rules may be simple to state, they require a fairly detailed analysis to apply. Two recent cases from the U.K. highlight the difficulties of cross-border enforceability of choice-of-law and choice-of-forum clauses."</font></p> <p><font size="2">CORPORATE UPDATE:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCSRQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVTR" target="_blank"><font size="2"><font color="red">Free With Registration:</font> Corporate Governance</font></a><br/><font size="2">Thursday, September 25, 2008<br/>By David A. Katz and Laura A. McIntosh<br/><br/>"David A. Katz, a partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, and Laura A. McIntosh, a consulting attorney for the firm, write that, amid the current turmoil on Wall Street, the recently affirmed <em>CSX</em> case, highlights certain hedge funds' practice of taking complicated positions in target companies in order to deliberately evade reporting requirements and illustrates the need for a more comprehensive disclosure regime and regulation of the credit default swap market."</font> </p></font>

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on September 25, 2008 (boomark / email).