ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Troll Tracker

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Patent Troll Tracker

Innovative Patented Technology Asserts Patent Not Invented By Scott Harris

By Troll Tracker

ADVERTISEMENTS
I reported here that Innovative Patented Technology LLC, a James Beauregard Parker company, existed solely to assert the patents invented by former Fish & Richardson partner Scott Harris. So imagine my surprise when last Thursday, Innovative Patented Technology, represented by Niro Scavone, sued ICON Health & Fitness on a patent invented by Gary J. Colassi, a different Niro Scavone client. Correction: Innovative Patented Technology exists solely to assert patents it didn't invent, just like many others are doing. Hey - it's the American way. (Yeah, let's not "cause harm to the current regime" and "destabilize" this wonderful system of ours).

Colassi, from Norton, Massachusetts, owns the World Gym in Foxborough, home of the New England Patriots. According to the Boston Globe, he sued Cybex International in 2002 on a "Treadmill Belt Support Deck." Three years later, Colassi's lawyers at Niro Scavone won a $2.5 million jury verdict for him ($2.63M including interest). Judge Rya Zobel (D. Mass.) granted a permanent injunction in favor of Colassi. That verdict was affirmed on appeal on February 14, 2007. The Federal Circuit issued its mandate on March 30, 2007.

Curiously, despite this tremendous victory, Colassi wasted no time getting rid of his patent. Before the Federal Circuit even officially affirmed the district court, Colassi assigned the patent (which had been 6,123,646, but reissued in 2006 as RE39,180). Innovative Patented Technology became the owner of the '180 reissue patent as of February 28, 2007. That's now two Niro Scavone clients who "found" James B. Parker to continue to assert their patents.

While the Colassi v. Cybex lawsuit was filed in Boston, and went through an extensive Markman hearing and ruling with Judge Zobel there, along with extensive motion practice, a jury trial, and post trial motions, Innovative Patented Technology sued ICON, a Delaware corporation with Utah headquarters, in West Palm Beach, Florida. That's near where Parker lives, but otherwise has no connection to the case.

Why would Gary Colassi, fresh off a $2.6M verdict and permanent injunction, affirmed on appeal, then sell his patents to another Niro client, James Parker? Could it be that Parker is funding the expenses for the probably contingency-fee lawsuit and Colassi gets a cut? For Colassi's sake, I hope so. But it's an interesting strategy, with these Scott Harris and now Gary Colassi cases coming to Parker and then being filed in South Florida. I don't pretend to understand it yet, but there's something about this strategy that just cries for investigation by a real journalist.

Full post as published by Patent Troll Tracker on January 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0307 secs (new cache)