Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Citizen Media Law Project
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Citizen Media Law ProjectDocumenting Your Vote: California Election Laws
By Sam Bayard
As part of a new project spearheaded by YouTube and PBS called "Video Your Vote," the CMLP is doing research on the state laws regulating activities at polling places on Election Day. Our specific focus is on laws that impact voters' ability to document their own voting experiences through video and still photography, as well as their ability to carry out other newsgathering functions, such as interviewing other voters outside of polling places. In this post, I'll look at how California's election laws affect these activities.
The California law with most immediate relevance to citizen media creators who want to document the vote is California Election Code § 18541. This statute makes it a crime for anyone, within 100 feet of a polling place, to "photograph, videotape, or otherwise record a voter entering or exiting a polling place" with "the intent of dissuading another person from voting." The 100-foot zone is measured from the interior voting area itself, not from the exterior of the building; so most of it will likely be inside the polling place.
Because section 18541 requires intent to dissuade someone from voting, it does not appear to ban outright the use of cameras and recording equipment in the 100-foot zone. But it does make such activity risky. Your intent is invisible. While you may not have any intention of dissuading anyone from voting, poll workers might see your conduct differently than you do. You could ultimately prevail before a court if the state chose to prosecute you, but you might still get kicked out of the polling place on Election Day and/or have to deal with some gigantic legal hassles.
Other statutory provisions may also affect your ability to document your own voting experience inside the polling place. First, California Election Code § 14221 (scroll down to the relevant section) says that voters may only be in the voting area for certain specific purposes -- "receiving, preparing, or depositing their ballots." By implication, this statute may make it unlawful to carry out other activities -- like filming or photographing -- in the voting area. Second, if you're interested in photographing or videoing your own marked ballot, two provision may impact your ability to do so. California Election Code § 14291 (scroll down) says that "[a]fter the ballot is marked, a voter shall not show it to any person in such a way as to reveal its contents." It's not clear whether this could apply to posting a photo or video of your ballot online after you've already cast it. In all likelihood, no one would bother to enforce the statute in that way. More pragmatically, California Election Code § 14224 (scroll down) limits your time in the voting booth to 10 minutes, so don't get carried away in there.
Finally, you shouldn't try to interview anyone within 100 feet of the voting area, get too close to other voters with your camera (especially inside), or otherwise interfere with the voting process. California Election Code § 18502 makes it a crime to "in any manner interfere[] . . . with voters exercising their rights of voting at an election," and California Election Code § 18541, mentioned above, makes it a crime to "speak to a voter on the subject of marking his or her ballot" within 100 feet of the voting area with the intent to dissuade the voter from voting. Again, the intent requirement may take your newsgathering activity outside of section 18541, but it is certainly something to be aware of. Outside the 100-foot buffer zone, you're generally free to take photographs, film, and interview other voters (with their permission).
If you want to contact California election officials directly to clarify how any or all of these provisions may impact your Election Day activities, please consult our Documenting Your Vote page for contact information.
Given the tight time schedule between now and the election, we'd love the help of our readers with this election law research. If you know of any other provisions of California law that might affect someone's ability to document the vote, or any cases interpreting California law on these issues, please let us know in the comments. For that matter, if you've got input on election laws in other states, please leave a comment or contact us directly.
Full post as published by Citizen Media Law Project on October 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Hewlett-Packard and Staples
allegedly violated antitrust laws in collaborating on the sale of replacement ink jet printer cartridges.
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.

Californians to vote on major drug sentencing reform on election day
"A Paper Jam Roils California Vote"
California Labor Law: Here's a Law You May Not have Known…
Vote law appeal likely by early Fall
California Overregulation is Overburdening Small Associations








