ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS



Emergency Economic Stabilization Act Bonus Forfeiture Provision Differs from Similar Sarbanes-Oxley Provision

It should be noted that the forfeiture standards under section 111(b)(2)(B) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act differ significantly differ from the forfeiture provisions of section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. With regard to financial institutions participating in the Treasury?s troubled asset relief program, section 111(b)(2)(B) states that the firm must provide for the recovery by the financial institution of any bonus or incentive compensation paid to a senior executive officer based on statements of earnings, gains, or other criteria that are later proven to be materially inaccurate.

Section 304 of Sarbanes-Oxley requires the forfeiture by a public company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer of any bonus, incentive-based compensation, or equity-based compensation received, and any profits from sales of the company's securities, during the twelve-month period following a materially non-compliant financial
report. Section 111(b)(2)(B) differs from section 304 because, first, the standard under section 111(b)(2)(B) applies more broadly to the three most highly compensated executive officers in addition to the CEO and CFO.

The EESA statute also applies to both public and private financial institutions, while section 304 applies only to public companies. In addition, while section 304 is exclusively triggered by an accounting restatement; section 111(b)(2)(B is not, nor does the latter limit the recovery period. Further, the EESA provision covers not only material inaccuracies relating to financial reporting, as Sarbanes-Oxley does, but also material inaccuracies relating to other performance metrics used to award bonuses and incentive compensation.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on October 31, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/06/26 08:26:17)