ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Des Moines Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Des Moines Personal Injury Lawyer

Federal Preemption: Are lobbying dollars influencing medical research opinions?

By Steve Lombardi

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here is how it’s supposed to work. Pharmaceutical companies conduct research and develop drugs that treat our ailments and diseases. During the R&D phase the pharmaceutical company scientists conduct experiments; and when the research shows promise and appears to have indicia of being safe for humans the FDA through it’s medical scientists review the application along with all the research data and if it appears safe they approve the drug for sale to people; people like you and I and our mothers and fathers. Of course a person gets these drugs with a prescription written by their doctor. The doctor is supposed to read the warnings and discuss potential side effects with the patient. The doctor’s office is then supposed to do blood tests to monitor how patients’ organs are responding to the new drug. If there are complications or serious side effects from taking the drug, the doctor is supposed to write a report and send it to the FDA where those reports are accumulated and provide a data base for future decision making about the drug. The report and how it is written or whether it is written by the doctor is what this drug safety monitoring system is based. If no reports are written and filed then other patients may suffer the same fate. If the report is written in such vague terms as the FDA distinguishes this patient’s experience as not material, then other patients may suffer the same fate.

So when my colleague, Mike Bryant, reports that the University of Minnesota Medical School is considering banning all gifts to doctors from the pharmaceutical industry, it is a big deal. Because in doing so they are placing patient safety and the credibility of the FDA monitoring system, along with the doctor’s responsibility to their patient ahead of lobbying influence that is interfering with all of the above.

We think the University of Minnesota Medical School would be smart in doing so. That would be the correct diagnosis and treatment for what ails this issue. Full speed ahead!

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Steve Lombardi

Full post as published by Des Moines Personal Injury Lawyer on November 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (new cache)