ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

NHTSA Attempts to Preempt Certain State Seat Belt Laws

By Greg Webb

ADVERTISEMENTS

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has attempted to preempt state tort law by redefining “designated seating positions.” The new definition helps determine the number of seat belts required in a vehicle, and eliminates the exception for auxiliary seats. This allows all intended seating locations to provide crash protection.

The final rule uses specific language in the body of the rule to preempt state tort claims. NHTSA has used preemptive language in safety standards 20 times in the past three years, said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen and former NHTSA administrator. However, previous preemption language has only been in the preamble and not the text of the rule, which made it an advisory opinion, Lee Weisbrod, president of the trial lawyers’ American Association of Justice, observed. He also noted that the language is contrary to congressional intent.

Because of the suggestion of the blanket immunity, Claybrook concluded that “more defective vehicles will be manufactured, fewer will be recalled, the public will have less information about injury causation and more families will needlessly lose loved ones on our roads each day.”

This measure, pushed by the Bush Administration, invades states' rights and is terrible for the American public. NHTSA, and the federal government, is currently incapable of effectively monitoring the auto manufacturers when it comes to establishing and enforcing feasible safety standards for automobiles. One of the most effective checks on the auto industry is the American trial bar, which has, over the past many decades, brought about many of the safety features seen on modern automobiles. Because of trial lawyers suing the manufacturers for building unsafe automobiles, the manufacturers have been dragged kicking and screaming to the alter of safety. What NHTSA is doing, with prodding from the current administration, is trying to grant immunity to the automobile manufacturers, one step at a time. No one should have immunity from being held responsible for his/her/its actions, including Corporate America.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb

Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on November 09, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/03/26 13:53:01)