Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyMedia coverage of Hayes oral argument is not gun shy
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
I complained in this post yesterday that the Second Amendment got absolutely no love or attention from the Supreme Court when it heard oral argument in the Hayes case. Specifically, neither the Second Amendment nor the decision in Heller was even mentioned once during the Hayes oral argument. For this reason and others, I was quite intrigued to discover this kind of coverage of the Hayes oral argument today in the Los Angeles Times. Note this heading and subheading for the report on Hayes:
Domestic violence abusers could get gun rights -- The Supreme Court will decide whether people convicted of misdemeanor assault against their spouses or partners should have their 2nd Amendment rights restored because of a flaw in federal law.
Consider also the story's lead and these additional snippets:
Thousands convicted of a misdemeanor for threatening or assaulting a spouse or girlfriend could once again own guns because of a flaw in the federal law...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on November 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Wind and Hail Coverage
Allstate Corp. agrees to restore insurance coverage and pay $250,000 settlement.
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Florida Medicaid
Limiting Coverage of Drugs for Kids
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Roundup of media coverage of oral arguments in Quanta v. LG
Ohio Supreme Court oral argument streaming
Gall and Kimbrough - Briefs, Trancripts and Links to Coverage
Adam Liptak on Harbison v. Bell







