ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Discriminations

The Misunderstanding Of Civil Rights At The Gretna Breeze

ADVERTISEMENTS

Gretna, Nebraska, a city of 2355 souls (in 2000) in Sarpy County, Nebraska, is the fastest growing city in Nebraska. Unfortunately, this growth in size does not seem to have been accompanied by a comparable growth in understanding civil rights at the Gretna Breeze.

Its editorial, ?Negative Action,? begrudgingly acknowledges that ?Equal opportunity for everyone regardless of race or gender sounds like the best way to approach hiring and firing employees and admitting students to college.? But ?sounds like,? to the Breezy editors, does not mean ?is,? and the passage of the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative, by a Michigan-sized majority, leaves them with nothing but a forlorn sounding ?hope? that things won?t get much worse.

Let?s just hope it [equal opportunity for everyone regardless of race or gender] works.

Here?s hoping women of childbearing age are still able to find work.

Here?s hoping black teenagers from low-income families can scrape together the money for college when they don?t get that sorely needed scholarship money which was once set aside specifically for them.

Here?s hoping someone of Middle Eastern descent is able to find a job, a school, a place to live ... anything.

Here?s hoping the Breezy editors will explain in a future editorial why they think prohibiting their state government from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual on the basis of race, ethnicity, or gender ? requiring, that is, ?equal opportunity for everyone regardless of race or gender? ? could possibly have a negative effect on ?women of childbearing age? looking for work or ?someone of Middle Eastern descent? trying to find ?... anything.? Do they really believe that before NCRI passed the state did, or should, grant preferential treatment to women of childbearing age looking for a job, or to people of Middle Eastern descent looking for ... anything?

It is true that NCRI will, or at least should, prevent the state from restricting scholarship money to teenagers of one race, but apparently a substantial majority of Nebraskans (58% of those voting), unlike the Breezy editors, see treating citizens without regard to their race as a Good Thing.

Full post as published by Discriminations on November 19, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)