ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Reinstating an employee to his former position after being found guilty of disciplinary charges ruled irrational under the circumstances

ADVERTISEMENTS
Reinstating an employee to his former position after being found guilty of disciplinary charges ruled irrational under the circumstances
Matter of Social Services Employees Union, Local 371 v City of New York Administration for Children's Services, 2008 NY Slip Op 08979, Decided on November 18, 2008, Appellate Division, First Department

In this appeal, the Appellate Division vacated a Supreme Court?s confirmation of a disciplinary grievance arbitration award that Local 371 had asked the lower court to confirm.

In addition, the court specifically granted the Administration for Children?s Services? (ACS) Article 75 motion objecting to the disciplinary arbitrator?s award providing for the grievant?s reinstatement to his former supervisory position.

According to the ruling, the grievant, a Child Protection Specialist Supervisor II ACS, pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the fourth degree. The offense to which he had pleaded guilty: filing false income tax returns using confidential ACS client information to fraudulently claim entitlement to state and local tax credits.

The Appellate Division said: ?We find that the arbitrator's award, which determined that while grievant had engaged in a censurable course of conduct that justified punishment he should be restored to his supervisory position at ACS, is irrational and defies common sense.?

If reinstated to the position of ACS supervisor, said the court, the grievant again would have access to the ACS database from which he extracted the information he used to perpetrate his crime.

The court then remanded the matter to the arbitrator for reconsideration of an appropriate penalty.

The text of the decision in posted on the Internet at:

http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_08979.htm

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on November 20, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)