Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: San Antonio Personal Injury LawyerHorrific Wreck Being Disputed - Texas Supreme Court to Decide
By Beth Janicek
The Austin American Statesman reported that while Richard Gibbons was fleeing San Marcos police, he smashed into Greg and Maribel Tanner's car which left 7-year-old Roney Tanner comatose for a week, in the hospital for a month, and years of physical therapy.
Nationwide Insurance the company that insured Gibbons would not pay the Tanner family. Gibbons’ policy was for $300,000.00 which the Tanners hoped would pay their son’s medical bills.
The insurance policy included a standard intentional acts exclusion which voids coverage if the driver deliberately caused an accident. Nationwide further states that Gibbons violated his contract stating that fleeing the police was intentional and that it was foreseeable to end in a wreck. The Tanners’ attorney argues that due to Gibbons braking prior to hitting the Tanners, the impact was not intentional. The case is now before the Texas Supreme Court and should issue a decision next year. Two courts have already sided with the Columbus, Ohio based Nationwide Insurance.
The Texas Supreme Court has routinely sided with the insurance company and the Austin American Statesman editorializes that the Texas Supreme Court "rules for insurance companies and other corporations an overwhelming percentage of the time." It "has embarrassed Texas with its demonstrable tilt toward insurers and other corporate defendants" and "gone out of its way to protect businesses from lawsuits to a degree that even the Texas Legislature and the defense bar can't stomach. That's why the court's decision in the Tanners' suit against Nationwide will be closely observed."
The comments following the Statesman editorial are particularly interesting and point out that voters should watch this case closely to see if the Supreme Court will continue its ways or find a case where perhaps the insurance company should be held accountable.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Beth Janicek
Full post as published by San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyer on December 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Texas Employment Law
alleged violations of Texas labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Texas' KB Home Hit with Price Fixing Class Action
Texas' KB Home Faces Price Fixing Class-Action
BP to Pay $15M for Texas Refiney Violations of Clean Air Act
BP to Pay $15M for Texas Refiney Violations of Clean Air Act
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
BP
Settles More Claims From Texas Refinery Explosion

Texas Supreme Court upholds juvenile's right to counsel
"Texas appeals polygamist ruling; State Supreme Court to decide whether families will be reunited"
"Ted Olson v. Joe Larisa: Will the Supreme Court Decide"
Exorcising Free Exercise: Texas Supreme Court Rules That Church Can Injure Minors During Exorcisms
Texas Court to Consider Insurers Intentional Acts Exclusion








