Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly

Criminal Law

: Capital Defense Weekly

Per curiam: Hedgpeth v. Pulido

By Karl R. Keys, Esq.

“The United States Supreme Court issued one decision today.  In Hedgpeth v. Pulido, the Court issued a per curiam decision, with 3 justices dissenting as to the remand, in which it held that a conviction based on jury instructions containing more than one theory of guilt, where one theory is invalid, is to be judged under the harmless error standard.  The Ninth Circuit had found the error to be structural error.” [via Harmful Error] From that opinion: A conviction based on a general verdict is subject tochallenge if the jury was instructed on alternative theories of guilt and may have relied on an invalid one. See Strom-berg v. California, 283 U. S. 359 (1931); Yates v. United States, 354 U. S. 298 (1957). In this case the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that such an error is?structural error,? requiring that the conviction be set aside on collateral review without regard to whether the flaw in the instructions prejudiced the defendant...continue to full post

Full post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on December 02, 2008 (boomark / email).