ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

Europe court finds Finland violated human rights convention

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

ADVERTISEMENTS
[JURIST] The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled unanimously Tuesday that Finland violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the "right to respect for private and family life" - in a case involving a minor targeted by pedophiles. In K.U. v. Finland (application no. 2872/02), the court found that Finnish authorities failed to provide a legal framework to protect the applicant's rights when his privacy was invaded by a personal ad with sexual connotations that was posted on the Internet without his knowledge. The applicant was 12 years old at the time of the incident in 1999. The court said that at the time the incident occurred, the Finnish legislature should have already identified the need and provided a legal "framework for reconciling the confidentiality of Internet services with the prevention of disorder or crime" so that that there would have been a legal basis for the Helsinki District Court to oblige the Internet service provider to identify the culprit. Within the next three months from the date of the judgment, Finnish authorities may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR, but such requests are only granted in exceptional cases that raise a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the convention or its protocols. The Finnish legislature subsequently passed the Exercise of Freedom of Expression in Mass Media Act that now provides a remedy to victims of Internet crime, but it was not in effect at the time of the incident. After the district court declined to oblige the Internet service provider to identify the user, the case was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Finland declined to hear the case. The case was filed with the ECHR in January 2002, but was not declared admissible until June 2006.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on December 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/01/26 02:22:33)