Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation BlogChancery Rules Alleged Settlement Agreement Not Enforceable
By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
In Delaware Dept. of Educ. v. Doe, (Del. Ch., Nov. 21, 2008), read opinion here, the Chancery Court was presented with the issue of whether a purported settlement agreement was binding in light of an issue about whether the negotiating attorneys had the authority of their clients to bind them to the terms of the alleged settlement agreement. Utimately, the court reasoned that the attorneys did not bind their clients to the terms of the agreement.
Based on Rule 56(h), the court treated read more
Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on December 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

A "Cue" From Third DCA: Mediation Settlements Must Be Signed (Or "Make Sure You Read Rule 1.730")
Court of Chancery Sets Fees for Supplemental Proxy Materials
Fee Contract Provisions Enforceable Against Sophisticated Client
Massachusetts Judge Decides E-Mail Exchange Sufficient to Form an Enforceable Settlement Agreement
Raisor v. Raisor, Ky Mediated Settlement Agreement
Delaware Chancery Rules in Merrill Lynch vs. BofA








