Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingFourth Circuit addresses whether a party joined as a defendant to a counterclaim may remove the case to federal court solely because the counterclaim satisfies the jurisdictional requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Chief Judge Karen J. Williams wrote the majority opinion, in which Circuit Judge Robert B. King joined. The majority held that removal to federal court could not be accomplished under those circumstances. Circuit Judge Paul V. Niemeyer dissented, explaining that "I conclude that CAFA does indeed authorize AT&T to remove this interstate class action, even though AT&T was sued as a counterclaim defendant, not as an original defendant."
Full post as published by How Appealing on December 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Federal Transportation Equity Act of 2005
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Settlement
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Class Action Settlement
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Holiday Inn Express
Complimentary simplySmart™ "Remove" Make Up Remover Recalled

Fourth Circuit Issues Another CAFA Decision Against Removal In First-Impression Case
Removal By a Third-Party Defendant It's a Theory That's Not "Built Ford Tough."
Added RLUIPA Counterclaim Not Enough to Support Removal to Federal Court








