Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Offender Issues
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex Offender IssuesFL - After Adam Walsh, a sensational dose of caution
ADVERTISEMENTS
View the article here
12/19/2008
By Michael Kruse, Times Staff Writer
We've never been more safe. We've never been more afraid.
That's the paradox we're left with now that police have finally named a killer in the murder of Adam Walsh.
For 27 years, it seemed that the freckle-faced 6-year-old was snatched by the bogeyman Out There Somewhere. Last week we got a name: Ottis Toole, drifter and serial killer, who died in 1996 while in prison for other crimes. But since 1981, when...br/
br/
To see the rest of this article, please visit the Sex Offender Issues Blog
pa href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/SexOffenderIssues?a=q7rLQW"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/SexOffenderIssues?i=q7rLQW" border="0"/img/a/pdiv class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds...continue to full postFull post as published by Sex Offender Issues on December 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Florida Senate Report Weighs Pros, Cons of Adam Walsh Act Compliance
Vermont Weighing Costs, Benefits of AWA Implementation
Another federal district judge finds constitutional problems with Adam Walsh Act
WDNY Judge Upholds Constitutionality of Adam Walsh Act, Citing its Safety Valve Provision
Notable Adam Walsh Act ruling from Eleventh Circuit








