Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> ClassActionBlawg
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: ClassActionBlawgThird Circuit Examines Impact of the Rigorous Analysis Standard on Conflicting Expert Testimony
By Paul Karlsgodt
ADVERTISEMENTS
Shannon P. Duffy of The Legal Intelligencer has authored an article summarizing the Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-1689 (3d Cir., Dec. 30, 2008), which the article calls a “ruling that is sure to be required reading for antitrust lawyers.” The decision also addresses more general class certification issues that are [...]Full post as published by ClassActionBlawg on December 31, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Mirrors
Recalled Due to Impact and Laceration Hazards
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

US v. Nacchio: The 10th Circuit Reverses
No Abuse of Discretion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Testimony on False Confessions
The Underconsidered Option of Using Contradictory Experts.








