ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

Paul Wilmott's on Economic Theory

ADVERTISEMENTS
Circulation in macroeconomics

Image via Wikipedia

Paul Wilmott has an amusing rant about financial economists, which is cruel but fair.


"My failure led me to think about economists, as opposed to economics, and they're much easier to figure out.

This is how it works.

An economist starts with a few axioms, ones that bear a vague similarity to a small part of the human condition under restricted situations and in an idealized world. (You get my drift here?)

From those axioms follows a theorem. More often than not this will be a theorem based upon rational behaviour.

That theorem gets a name.

And that's the point I identify as being the problem: The jargonizing of complex ideas based upon irrelevant assumptions into an easily used and abused building block on which to build the edifice of nonsense that is modern economics.

Small assumption by small assumption, the economist builds up his theories into useless gibberish.

By acceptance of each step he is able to kid himself he is making progress. And that's why I struggle with economics.

It is not mathematics where, barring mistakes, each step is true and indisputable and therefore you can accept it, even forget it, and move on.

And others can do the same, using everyone else's results without question.

This you cannot do in a soft science. I've mentioned this in another blog, beware of anyone talking about 'results' in finance or economics, it says more about them and their perception of the world than it does about the subject."

The building of axiom systems is often misunderstood even by those who engage in the task. The general idea is to construct a simple toy world, find an interesting phenomena, then argue that in the real world with its complexity and uncertainty, this phenomena still functions. Some of the most interesting examples of this type of modeling is to be found in Thomas Schelling's work, epecially in his book Choice and Consequences.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on January 13, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)