Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep LinksCourt Orders County to Release Geographic Mapping Data
By marcia
A California appeals court issued a good decision [PDF] this afternoon in County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Country, a case raising unusual open government, homeland security, and copyright questions.
In this case, the California First Amendment Coalition (CFAC) sued Santa Clara County under the California Public Records Act for a copy of the county's geographic information system basemap, which shows parcel boundaries, addresses, and other property data. Even though the county sells the basemap to customers for a stiff fee, it refused to provide the information in response to CFAC's request.
The county argued that it didn't have to release the basemap under the state public records law because the information 1.) had been turned over to the federal government and was therefore protected by the federal Critical Infrastructure Information Act; 2.) was exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act's general "catchall" provision; and 3.) was protected by copyright, so the county could license the basemap and impose restrictions on end users.
In 2007, a California superior court ordered [PDF] Santa Clara County to provide CFAC the basemap at the county's expense, and the county appealed. We joined the National Security Archive and Center for Democracy and Technology to file an amicus brief supporting CFAC, which you can read here [PDF].
In today's opinion, the appeals court rejected all of Santa Clara County's arguments and found that the basemap is a public record freely available to anyone who requests it?a victory not just for CFAC, but for everyone who believes the public has a right to government data. The superior court will now consider whether the county may charge processing fees beyond the cost of reproducing the basemap.
Full post as published by Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Correctional Managers
Jury orders Marion County to pay $1 million racial discrimination settlement to two former employees.
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Greka Oll and Gas
EPA Orders Clean-up of Toxic PCBs
T-mobile data plans, T-mobile, t-mobile phones
T-Mobile Faces Class Action over Limited Unlimited Data Plans
Contract Extortion
County Executive Robert Janiszewski ordered to pay Hudson County a $650,000 racketeering settlement.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Brain Mapping Site From National Geographic Magazine
Today at the Supreme Court | 10.14.08
Today at the Supreme Court | 11.2.08
Today at the Supreme Court | 11.10.08
Judge Lindman Orders the Release of Absentee Ballot Data
Today at the Supreme Court | 12.8.08








