ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

Executive Compensation, Treasury Reforms, and the Consequences of the Delaware Model

By J. Robert Brown

ADVERTISEMENTS

In the aftermath of President Obama's description of the payment of bonuses by companies participating in the bailout as "shameful," Treasury has rushed out new standards.  One of them required boards to set out policies with respect to the approval of luxury expenditures.  As the standard described:

  • Require Board of Directors’ Adoption of Company Policy Relating to Approval of Luxury Expenditures: The boards of directors of companies receiving exceptional assistance from the government must adopt a company-wide policy on any expenditures related to aviation services, office and facility renovations, entertainment and holiday parties, and conferences and events. This policy is not intended to cover reasonable expenditures for sales conferences, staff development, reasonable performance incentives and other measures tied to a company’s normal business operations. These new rules go beyond current guidelines, and would require certification by chief executive officers for expenditures that could be viewed as excessive or luxury items. Companies should also now post the text of the expenditures policy on their web sites.

What is extraordinary about this requirement is that it had to be required at all.  It has taken the federal government to tell boards that they must have policies in this area.  Why is that?  Shouldn't this already be the requirement?  It isn't. 

The standards for board behavior are set by Delaware and the Delaware courts.  The standards are abysmally low.  One need only read the Disney case to see that.  The need for these standards more than anything else in the Treasury proposal shows why corporate governance standards, specifically in the area of executive compensation, cannot be left to a court in a small state that has economic incentives to favor the board over shareholders.

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0027 secs (from cache 11/05/26 16:28:35)