Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomExecutive Compensation, Treasury Reforms, and the Consequences of the Delaware Model
By J. Robert Brown
In the aftermath of President Obama's description of the payment of bonuses by companies participating in the bailout as "shameful," Treasury has rushed out new standards. One of them required boards to set out policies with respect to the approval of luxury expenditures. As the standard described:
- Require Board of Directors’ Adoption of Company Policy Relating to Approval of Luxury Expenditures: The boards of directors of companies receiving exceptional assistance from the government must adopt a company-wide policy on any expenditures related to aviation services, office and facility renovations, entertainment and holiday parties, and conferences and events. This policy is not intended to cover reasonable expenditures for sales conferences, staff development, reasonable performance incentives and other measures tied to a company’s normal business operations. These new rules go beyond current guidelines, and would require certification by chief executive officers for expenditures that could be viewed as excessive or luxury items. Companies should also now post the text of the expenditures policy on their web sites.
What is extraordinary about this requirement is that it had to be required at all. It has taken the federal government to tell boards that they must have policies in this area. Why is that? Shouldn't this already be the requirement? It isn't.
The standards for board behavior are set by Delaware and the Delaware courts. The standards are abysmally low. One need only read the Disney case to see that. The need for these standards more than anything else in the Treasury proposal shows why corporate governance standards, specifically in the area of executive compensation, cannot be left to a court in a small state that has economic incentives to favor the board over shareholders.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Workers Compensation Overview
Federal laws that cover workplace injuries
Radio Transmitters
for Model Aircrafts Recalled
FedEx
Ground Business Model Wins Class Action in Washington
Options Backdating
Former Broadcom executive settles $1.3 million stock option backdating lawsuit.
Contract Extortion
County Executive Robert Janiszewski ordered to pay Hudson County a $650,000 racketeering settlement.
Hurricane Ike
Gulf Coast Residents Fight for Compensation
State Farm Undercompensation
alleging compensation for totaled vehicles is less than California law requires.

Treasury Guidance on Executive Compensation Provisions of the EESA
Treasury Announces Executive Compensation Rules Under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
Treasury Announces New Restrictions On Executive Compensation
Treasury Issues Additional Executive Compensation Rules Under TARP
Banks With TARP Funds Required by Treasury to File Report s







