ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Alabama Appellate Watch

Court Decides Appeal Though Appellant Did Not Comply With Briefing Rule

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Court of Civil Appeals in Barnette v. Robertson, No. 2070689 (Ala. Civ. App. Jan. 30, 2009), exercised its discretion to address the merits of the appellant’s argument even though the appellant, “in contravention of Rule 28(a)(10), Ala. R. App. P., fail[ed] to cite authority for [the] argument in his pro se appellate brief.”  When an appellate court is "’able to adequately discern’ the issues presented,” the court may, in its discretion, decide the merits of the appeal.

Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on February 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0269 secs (new cache)