ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> China Hearsay

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: China Hearsay

CSRC, CBRC Not Going to Like This

By Stan

ADVERTISEMENTS

The latest in virtual fun:

Shanghai-based online game company Giant Interactive (NYSE:GA) released a "stock trading" platform for gamers of its in-house developed 2.5D MMORPG Giant Online to trade virtual coins in January. Transactions, including exchanging gold for silver coins, will be charged 2% commission. The game’s gold coins can only be purchased with real money, while silver coins can only be acquired in the game.

Sounds harmless, I suppose, but the government has been pretty clear in the past few years about this kind of activity — you may recall when they cracked down on different uses of QQ coins. Essentially, when an online company starts acting like a bank, the CBRC (banks regulator) could get involved and stop the offending activities. I haven’t seen this "stock trading" type of thing before, but no doubt the CSRC (stock market regulator) will be taking a look. This all gets rather complicated, of course, because normally a computer game company does not fall within the jurisdiction of either the CBRC or CSRC. When a company encroaches on their turf, one way for them to get action is to complain to the AIC (companies regulator), essentially telling the AIC that they should investigate the offender for operating outside their stated business scope. This would work fairly well if government agencies here worked together and communicated on a regular basis (they don’t).

Listen, enforcement issues notwithstanding, the government really doesn’t like it when virtual currency starts acting like the real thing. When they went after QQ coins, the rhetoric was quite heated, with the gov’t saying that the value of the RMB was in danger. A bit of hyperbole, to be sure, but they consider this to be serious business.

I’m very curious, therefore, as to what will happen with Giant on this. Have they cleared all this with the authorities? {giggle} Or did they decide to go for it and see what happens?

Time will tell, but I have a feeling that this is not going to be a long-term project.

Full post as published by China Hearsay on February 11, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/01/26 00:24:00)